1. It can't just change. Someone has to initiate something. I would expect
you would need at least read (view) access through the chain down to your
specific DB you want to manage. Anything not in that chain you probably
don't need access to. Specifically it sounds like you need read down to your
admingroup and then some level higher at that point down.

2. Ah sorry. I was making assumption you were ent admin. I won't answer the
second question of this directly. Instead I will say the correct answer is
you need to go grab one of the ent admins and say HELP! And have them walk
through the perms with you or email you a doc with the perms (a simple
dsacls dump would be fine). In the meanwhile, ANYONE playing with the ACLs
in the Exchange container is a brave (or something else) soul. Exchange is
one of those things that you kind of want to launch and not muck with a
whole lot it seems. There is a lot of stuff that shouldn't hurt it which can
sometimes have deleterious affects and no one seems to know why. This
actually isn't a complete rip on Exchange, it is just that the product is
that complex and I haven't met anyone who has the great big picture on how
it all works and what it needs to be happy. It is dependent on another great
big complex product with the same issue. 

On the sep forest, I completely understand. If you don't have that, and
probably even if you did, you need to get the communication going. It is
critical, you have one organism there, Active Directory, everyone needs to
be working together to make sure it works properly. Alternatively it needs
to be locked down very well and the people with almighty control need to
keep their hands in a box so they don't touch anything, even by accident and
even if it shouldn't hurt anyone. :o)

Politics is always the worst part of the whole thing. Most technical issues
have solutions or can be worked around, politics is another matter and the
solution tends to be someone gets shot. In the end, you hope the right
person but more often than not that doesn't seem to be the case. <eg>

At this point, you really need to call the ent admins up on the bat phone
and say, hey listen, something isn't right here. Could you guys help
troubleshoot or find out why I can't see past X container in the Exchange
Services area or at the very least send me some dumps of info I need?


  joe


 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 4:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT:EXCHANGE weirdness

i checked the perms thru adsiedit-
blackberry account(ex view only admin according to ESM)- has all the
appropriate rights except no entry at the ORG container and at the
Administrative groups container.

Domain admins in child domain with similliar issues(ex full admin according
to ESM)- same thing


Now, the questions-
1.how could this just change? I know the root domain guys took us out of the
Exchange org and used the delegation wizard to give us full access to our
admin group thru ESM. same thing for the blackberry account, except view
only.
do we still need to be delegated something at the org level? it would seem
to be so. to be able to administer our admin group, would we still need some
rights on the org level?

2. how can i take ownership with no rights on an object. can a domain admin
in a child domain write to the config container of a forest?


This is why i want our own forest. If you see my previous threads, its
always about how to break away from the forest or what a child domain admin
can or can't do without enterprise admin access, dependency on the root,
etc.


we always have issues with the guys on top screwing us up on the bottom and
the serious lack of communication. they seem to think that as child domain
admins we can't screw THEM. i'm trying to convince my CIO to beak away or at
least ask for enterprise admin rights. I want to at least show them that we
can screw them up or get access to enterprise admin so they would then give
us this access or we would leave the forest(since as a sister corp, we are
on equal footing with them in everyway. its just politics).

thank you guys so much for all your help.

-----Original Message-----
From: joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 4:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT:EXCHANGE weirdness


Everything I read in this chain is definitely saying permission issues. Note
that the main permissions for Exchange are iun the config container. Anyone
from any domain that has permissions to that container can be dangerous.
Including domain admins of children domain. 

The fact that you can't even read the permissions from a certain level on is
screaming someone changed the permissions AT THAT level. The fun thing is if
you don't have permissions to see the permissions, you will have to take
ownership to see them or figure out what account has the perms necessary to
see them. Once you can see them, then you can figure out how bad it is. I
would personally try to do a dsacls dump of each layer under the Exchange
Services level and see where the perms start locking down. Again, you may
have to take ownership at some point to see anything.

  joe



 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mulnick, Al
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 2:52 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT:EXCHANGE weirdness

Checking this document, can you verify what permissions are associated with
the BB account?

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;823018 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 2:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT:EXCHANGE weirdness

they added an exchange2k3 server and a win2k3 dc. how would that change
things?
in my child domain, i'm a full exchange admin and can see everything. in
another domain, the exchange full admins can't see anything. and of course
the view only blackberry service account can't see anything in my domain.
all our dc's are at sp 3 or 4.
how would installing exchange2k3 or win2k3 change the security on the config
container as to diallow viewing for one domain and not another?
thats the only change made according to them...

i'm very confused. 
thanks for yor continuing help in this. i really appreciate it.


-----Original Message-----
From: Mulnick, Al [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 2:13 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT:EXCHANGE weirdness


They could have added an Exchange 2k3 server for starters :)

Nothing is logged on the Exchange server or the DC/GC when you try to access
that information? Is audit logging turned on?

Did they upgrade the root domain as well?  Those permissions are set on the
configuration container and you should have view rights to them as a
delegated admin.  If you don't, then something has changed and seems to be
recurring.  Check with the root folks to see what's changed in the last few
days in the root domain.  What was added etc? 



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 12:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT:EXCHANGE weirdness

According to RIM, its a premissions error(duh). they suggested upgrading the
mapi32.dll and cdo.dll to the same version as the exchange server.
while the blackberry service is now starting, i still can't see anything in
exchange system manager or adsiedit logged in as the blackberry account.

there is nothing logged on the exchange server.


no replication errors on any of my DC's. or the ones in the root.

have'nt spoken to the guys in the root, but what could they do to change
things if the account seems ok in ESM?

thanks

-----Original Message-----
From: Mulnick, Al [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 10:42 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT:EXCHANGE weirdness


There would be an event logged on the Exchange server if your membership
were incorrect.  Depending on version, this would be different.

Have you checked with the root folks to see if they've done anything lately?
How's replication working?

Interested to hear what RIM comes back with as well.

Al 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 10:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT:EXCHANGE weirdness

the bb service logs an application specfic error(i'm trying to find out its
meaning from RIM).
there is nothing in the other logs.
the bb service is a member of the local admin group on the server and domain
users, thats it.
exchange "view only admin" is delegated directly to the bb acount on our
admin group.
the other delegation is "full exchange admin" to the domain admins group.

where would i check for changes to the Exchange domain servers/enterprise
servers groups?
or errors in group membership?


as per my pervious post, rthis kind of thing has happened before to the
domain admins which had full exchange admin rights delegated directly to
them.

thanks

-----Original Message-----
From: Mulnick, Al [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 10:02 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT:EXCHANGE weirdness


What's the error messages when the service tries to start?  What's in the
security and application and system logs?

What groups is the bb service a member of completely?  Which one is
delegated exchange rights and how does that compare with the service
account?

I think that's a good place to start troubleshooting this.  I think you
should also look for any errors indicating a change in server group
membership and any changes to the Exchange domain servers and enterprise
servers groups.

Al 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 9:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT:EXCHANGE weirdness

here's the deal-

i've had this samething happen to a child domain. the domain admins had full
exchange admin rights on their admin group. however, when you open up
exchange system manager, you could'nt see anything. In adsiedit, if you
looked in the exchange services container in the configuration partition,
you could'nt look deeper than the org. there was nothing there. and if you
wanted to look at the acl's of the org, it was empty.
STILL, in exchange system manager, you saw they had full exchange admin
rights(and i'm not talking about recieve as, to open a mailbox. i just mean
full rights to view and administer their admin group.). this was never
resolved.
Now i have the same issue in my child domain with the blackberry service
account.
I'm the only one who administers this domain and nothing was changed.
really. 
is there an explicit deny somewhere? how would i find it? tgere's nothing in
the security log on the blackberry server.
this is the kind of stuff that keeps me up all night.

could someone have done something at the root? we have no gpo on our domain,
dc, or site that would cause this. i checked them all, including the local
one on the server.

what the heck is going on here? this is twice now with 2 seperate domains!!!
both domains are mixed mode running win2k. the root domain is native mode.
exchange 2k is native mode.
all servers are win2k except on win2k3 server in the root and an exchange2k3
server, also in the root.

thanks

-----Original Message-----
From: Mulnick, Al [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 9:09 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT:EXCHANGE weirdness


Permissions get changed all the time.  Monitoring the DC's for group
membership changes has been helpful here.  You'd be surprised what people
think is a good idea ;)

As for permissions, putting that account in domain admins is likely the
wrong thing to do.  If you look in the security logs, you'll likely find a
clue to the answer as to why it won't start.  My guess is that it has
conflicting permissions.  By default Exchange 200x doesn't allow
administrators and other admins the ability to log into to peoples
mailboxes.  That may be preventing the service from starting.  Could also be
a GPO change or other I'm sure, but I'd start with the event logs to see why
it won't start.

Al 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 8:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] OT:EXCHANGE weirdness

i have a user(blackberry service account) who has full exchange admin rights
on our admin group, now suddenly(i know there is no "now suddenly", but
nothing changed, honest), blackberry service wont start and when i open
exchange manager, i can't  see any admin group logged in as the blackberry
account.
when i log in as another account, i can see everything. i put the bb account
into domain admins, and still same thing.
why?
and more importantly, how do permissions and roles get lost like that?
I'm running a win2k ad mixed mode and exchange 2k native mode.
thanks
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to