It works fine for me. :o)

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Adner
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 8:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Question on Auditing GPO Changes

Hmm.  That seems to have backfired. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
> Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 19:09
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Question on Auditing GPO Changes
> 
> Wow you are being awfully generous David, that is going to cost you a 
> fortune! Thanks though!
> 
>   joe
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Adner
> Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 1:03 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Question on Auditing GPO Changes
> 
> Free enterprise licenses to all members of this list? ;>
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gil 
> > Kirkpatrick
> > Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 11:32
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Question on Auditing GPO Changes
> > 
> > <shameless product plug>
> > NetPro's Change Auditor for AD also tracks GPO changes, along with 
> > _all_ other aspects of AD configuration, and provides who,
> what, when,
> > where, and why something was changed, as well as before and after 
> > values for each changed configuration items. See 
> > http://www.netpro.com/products/changeauditor/index.cfm.
> > </shameless product plug>
> > 
> > -gil
> > 
> > Gil Kirkpatrick
> > CTO, NetPro
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Rachui, Scott
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 11:24 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Question on Auditing GPO Changes
> > 
> > Full Armor's GPO Repository would be a good choice.
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Darren 
> > Mar-Elia
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 12:33 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Question on Auditing GPO Changes
> > 
> > 
> > David-
> > It depends upon what you are really interested in seeing. 
> > There is no good way, out-of-the-box, to audit what change was 
> > actually made to a particular GPO setting in either Win2K or Win2k3.
> > If you just want to see that "somebody" made "some" change
> to a GPO,
> > then you can use DS auditing to look for changes to the
> Group Policy
> > Container (GPC) object representing a given GPO, which is
> what you've
> > already discovered. If you set up file auditing on the
> SYSVOL part of
> > the GPO (the GPT), then you will only get that a particular
> file in a
> > particular GPO was changed--you won't get any more detail than that.
> > That can give you some inkling as to what policy area was changed, 
> > since each policy area stores its settings in different
> folders in the
> > GPT.
> > 
> > The alternative is to go to some 3rd party solution--there
> are several
> > vendors now that offer more detailed change tracking of GPO.
> > 
> > Darren
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Adner
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 10:17 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [ActiveDir] Question on Auditing GPO Changes
> > 
> > What's the best way to audit for GPO changes?  I enabled "Audit 
> > directory service access", which causes an audit event to
> occur, but
> > it also does the same for other kinds of DS changes, which
> make it a
> > bit more cumbersome.
> > This is for Windows 2000, btw.  Is it easier to do with W2K3?
> > 
> > I thought perhaps auditing for the actual file level
> changes, but I'm
> > not sure if that's a much cleaner solution...
> > 
> > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> > List archive:
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> > 
> > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> > List archive: 
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> > List archive: 
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> > List archive: 
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> 
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> 
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to