One more thing you might look at .... make sure you can see all the hidden and system files on the box, do a select all and then right click on properties and see what total size and size on disk being used by the files is. Then compare it against what is being reported as used space by windows. I once had an alternate data stream get into a box and that had similar symptoms.
Robert -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lou Vega Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 12:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Windows 2003 Clean Install results in high di sk space utlization The other 3 are identical hardware-wise, i.e., all are 1655MC Blade servers in a single chassis. The other 3 were initially built this time last year. I'm to the point now where I'm just gonna slick the machine *again* and start fresh. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mulnick, Al Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 1:22 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Windows 2003 Clean Install results in high di sk space utlization Really. You have three others where it worked fine and one that doesn't? All were provisioned "identically" and only one has the issue? Hmm... :) List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ ---- The information contained in this e-mail transmittal, including any attached document(s) is confidential. The information is intended only for the use of the named recipient. If you are not the named recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, disclosure, copying, or distribution of the contents hereof is strictly prohibited. List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
