This
sort of helps too -
-- http://msetechnology.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan DeStefano Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 4:54 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] Very OT: Please Settle a Bet Could anyone settle a bet for me? I
would like to know if Windows 95 was a 16 or 32-bit OS. One of us is saying that
it was natively 32-bit, but ran 16-bit apps in a VM, while the other one is
saying the reverse: it was a 16-bit OS that was capable of running 32-bit apps
in a VM. Also, one person is saying that W95
required DOS (like Win3.1.1) and the other is saying that, while built on DOS,
DOS was not required and the OS went above and beyond its DOS
roots. If anyone can settle these issues
and offer proof like links to Web pages and such, we would be
grateful. _________________________ Daniel
DeStefano PC Support
Specialist IAG
Research T.
212.871.5262 F.
212.871.5300 Measuring Ad Effectiveness on
Television The information contained
in this communication is confidential, may be privileged and is intended for the
exclusive use of the above named addressee(s). If you are not the intended
recipient(s), you are expressly prohibited from copying, distributing,
disseminating, or in any other way using any of the information contained within
this communication. If you have received this communication in error, please
contact the sender by telephone 212.871.5262 or by response via
e-mail. |
- RE: [ActiveDir] Very OT: Please ... Dean Wells
- RE: [ActiveDir] Very OT: Pl... Jimmy Andersson
- RE: [ActiveDir] Very OT: Pl... Carerros, Charles
- RE: [ActiveDir] Very OT... Dean Wells
- RE: [ActiveDir] Very OT... Rick Kingslan
- RE: [ActiveDir] Ver... Roger Seielstad
- RE: [ActiveDir] Ver... Roger Seielstad
- RE: [ActiveDir] Very OT... Roger Seielstad
- RE: [ActiveDir] Very OT... Roger Seielstad
- RE: [ActiveDir] Very OT: Pl... Perdue David J Contr InDyne/Enterprise IT