Hmm..it is not "completely" true in Windows 2000 either because Island problem fixed in Windows 2000 SP4. :- )
Santhosh Santhosh Sivarajan MCSE(W2K3/W2K/NT4),MCSA(W2K3/W2K/MSG),CCNA,Network+ Houston, TX On 5/11/05, Kingslan, Rick T. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Right you are. I actually meant it to be intended for Windows 2000 - but > upon rereading - I see where that could be misconstrued. > > And, yes - they did very nicely fix the islanding problem with the ForestDns > entries. Works out quite nicely, yes? > > -rtk > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ActiveDir- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 3:50 PM > > To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org > > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] 2003 DNS > > > > I see that the absence of that critical smiley tripped you. Here :) :) > > > > OK, now that we've got that out of the way, here's what I was trying to > > say > > in a round-about way. DNS Islanding is a W2K issue. If my reading > > materials > > and readings glasses are good, then this problem does not afflict W2K3. > > So, > > when you said "True for Windows 2000 well", I thought it should be > > rephrased > > as "It only applies to Windows 2000, and not Window 2003". > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I > > Microsoft MVP - Directory Services > > www.readymaids.com - we know IT > > www.akomolafe.com > > Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about > > Yesterday? -anon > > > > ________________________________ > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Kingslan, Rick T. > > Sent: Wed 5/11/2005 1:26 PM > > To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org > > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] 2003 DNS > > > > > > > > More appropriately, please interpret because I've obviously read Debbie's > > request wrong. > > > > -rtk > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ActiveDir- > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 12:43 PM > > > To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org > > > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] 2003 DNS > > > > > > <RTK, aka Rick T(for Trouble) Kingslan, sat down in his high chair and > > > bellowed as follows:> > > > >>> True for Windows 2000 as well > > > > > > To which I trembled and exclaimed: > > > > > > Don't you mean: True for Windows 2000, but not for Windows 2003? My > > cheat > > > sheets say that's what you meant. Maybe they need updating. > > > > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > > > Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I > > > Microsoft MVP - Directory Services > > > www.readymaids.com - we know IT > > > www.akomolafe.com > > > Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about > > > Yesterday? -anon > > > > > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > > > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > > > List archive: http://www.mail- > > archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > > > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > > List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > > > > > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > > List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
