Correct. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Adner Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2005 5:08 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag site----Why?
I read Joe's comments as not creating a lag site per-se, but using virtual DC's which are periodically saved (I'll refrain from saying backed up since it's not a "backup", as was recently discussed) in order to perform a Forest-wide recovery. I don't think he was referring to recovery of a few deleted objects. > Joe, you pretty much agreed with the lag site proposition towards the > end of your piece. Whether you virtualize it, put it is a different > physical location or just put it on a piece of hardware sitting in the > same server room and configured with a different replication schedule, > it all comes down to the same necessity of having a pristine DC that > has not received your deletion and from which you can repopulate your > F'ed up AD. List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
