RE: [ActiveDir] Preferred Bridgeheads

[Rick Kingslan]

Not that it’s necessarily BAD, but the one problem is that if the system that the ISTG is on fails, then the ISTG is down for that site until the ‘role’ is moved to another suitable machine. Rick From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rimmerman, Russ Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 2:03 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] Preferred Bridgeheads   We're almost all Win2k3 Domain Controllers, have a few left to upgrade.   Question is, we have at least one DC at each site configured as a preferred bridgehead for IP.  Is this not a good idea?  Is it best to not prefer any bridgeheads and let AD do its job?  I'm seeing a lot of event ID 1567's about it as well.   Thanks ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ This e-mail is confidential, may contain proprietary information of the Cooper Cameron Corporation and its operating Divisions and may be confidential or privileged. This e-mail should be read, copied, disseminated and/or used only by the addressee. If you have received this message in error please delete it, together with any attachments, from your system. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~