There are no replication issues and the schema master is in the
empty root domain. I have not taken it offline yet to do the upgrade. I fully
believe it is there installer and not the extensions.
Holland + Knight
Travis
Abrams
IT Security &
Systems Manager
Holland &
Knight LLP
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean Wells
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 5:14 PM
To: Send - AD mailing list
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Schema Updates
Which
domain is the schema FSMO in? Any replication issues? Have you verified
the schema FSMO is replicating? Have you taken it offline in order to
conduct this
upgrade?
--
Dean Wells
MSEtechnology
* Email: dwells@msetechnology.com
http://msetechnology.com
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 5:03 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Schema Updates
I saw that article. This is on the schema master with an account
that has Schema and Enterprise admins. We have two domains, empty top level root
and a production domain. We have two DC's in the root and 29 in the production.
All Windows 2003 with the exception of one that does have SP1 installed to test.
Travis
Abrams
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean Wells
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 4:42 PM
To: Send - AD mailing list
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Schema Updates
First hit from google is
-
... it
too references the "Schema updates allowed" value but I'd guess you've got
another problem since that is not required against a 2K3 DC, initial thoughts
lead me toward InitSync not being met.
Is the
update focused against the schema FSMO?
Please
describe your configuration, number of DCs/domains/OS versions
...
--
Dean Wells
MSEtechnology
* Email: dwells@msetechnology.com
http://msetechnology.com
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 4:30 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Schema Updates
The application has an installer that is used to update the
schema. When it runs it seems to be trying to enable the schema for writing and
fails. We receive the following error, "The system can not find the file
specified. (0x80070002)". I think this is an Avaya specific error.
My main reason for asking was the integrator was disagreeing with
me about 2003 already being enabled for Schema updates and I wanted to make sure
I wasn't going crazy. Is anyone else running this application in a 2003
environment?
Thanks,
Travis
Abrams
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean Wells
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 3:15 PM
To: Send - AD mailing list
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Schema Updates
Your
thinking is accurate but there are many other potential preventive factors, a
great deal more detail re: the errors you're experiencing would
help.
--
Dean Wells
MSEtechnology
* Email: dwells@msetechnology.com
http://msetechnology.com
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 2:59 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] Schema Updates
Hi,
I am having some problems updating the schema for Avaya Unified Messaging. It is my thinking that in Windows 2003 the schema is already enabled for updates as long as you are in the Schema Admins group. In Windows 2000 you had to enable the Schema to be updated. Am I correct or misguided?
Thanks!
Travis
Abrams
