The bigger trick is getting yourself a client cert to get on Corpnet wireless....
-------- Roger Seielstad E-mail Geek -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 4:13 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] SBS migration (was SBS Server Question) Very Cool. I would love to see that list :-) Wireless aircard and a tablet PC...you just gotta bring your own connectivity that's all. See ya next week! Michael B. Smith wrote: >I'm an Exchange MVP. We were invited to come up with a list of "why we >hate to support SBS" about a month ago for submission to the SBS >product team (apparently one of "our" product managers is across the >hall from one of "your" product managers). I think we came up with 11 >specific items dealing mainly with Exchange/User management and the >integration of ISA/RRAS. I'll see if I archived the list. > >I think the groups and the mailing lists are gonna be really quiet next >week, with little connectivity on campus for us! > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley, >CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] >Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 4:31 PM >To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org >Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] SBS migration (was SBS Server Question) > >Amen brother. > >I wish though you would be more specific though as I just happen to be >meeting with some folks next week and would love the inside from big >server land. [Please feel free to ping me directly] > >Our OU structure sucks. We know that. But ...boy ... you ain't >ripping my fingers off RWW or my monitoring email. :-) > >Michael B. Smith wrote: > > > >>And that is a real difficulty. >> >>The wizards should integrate seamlessly. Or the other tools should >>integrate seamlessly. Take your pick. >> >>I've got a couple of hundred client companies, probably 3 or 4 use SBS. >>I HATE touching the SBS clients because it's a fair bet there is a >>wizard for something that I'm not going to use a wizard for, because I >>can use one of my scripts or a native tool and do it quicker. (You can >>argue that someone that knows the wizards can do it more quickly with >>them -- and that's fine -- but I don't, and shouldn't have to.) >> >>It's a religious issue. >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan >>Bradley, >> >> > > > >>CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] >>Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 12:19 PM >>To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org >>Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] SBS migration (was SBS Server Question) >> >>Difficulty? >> >><cough cough> >> >>What difficulty? [please feel free to take this offline] the only >>difficult issues we have in SBSland is cleaning up the messes from >>folks that don't follow the wizards.... >> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>>Thanks! This must be SBS Week. Was at a user's group meeting last >>> >>> >>> >>> >>night and the topic came up again. (Main topic was R2) Sounds like >>Microsoft is getting the message about the difficulty of working with >>SBS. >> >> >> >> >>>Al Maurer >>>Service Manager, Naming and Authentication Services IT | Information >>>Technology Agilent Technologies >>>(719) 590-2639; Telnet 590-2639 >>>http://activedirectory.it.agilent.com >>>---------------------------------------------- >>>"Cry 'Havoc!' and let slip the dogs of war" - Anthony, in Julius >>> >>> >>> >>> >>Caesar III i. >> >> >> >> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan >>>Bradley, >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] >>>Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 1:57 PM >>>To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org >>>Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] SBS migration (was SBS Server Question) >>> >>>Transition pack or www.sbsmigration.com >>> >>>Transition pack is the best way however lets you keep the Remote web >>>workplace and monitoring email even after you break away from SBSland. >>> >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>OK, since the topic came up: I'm trying to figure out how to >>>>migrate >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>off SBS2003. >> >> >> >> >>>>Scenario is a recent acquisition where we want to migrate from >>>>company >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>SBS to corporate AD (standard 2003 domain). Trusts are out. Hack is >>both dangerous and illegal. >> >> >> >> >>>>MS offers a Transition Pack (for a cost) to upgrade the SBS2003 to >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>normal AD. Is there any other way? LDIF export? >> >> >> >> >>>>Thanks, >>>>AL >>>> >>>>Al Maurer >>>>Service Manager, Naming and Authentication Services IT | Information >>>>Technology Agilent Technologies >>>>(719) 590-2639; Telnet 590-2639 >>>>http://activedirectory.it.agilent.com >>>>---------------------------------------------- >>>>"Cry 'Havoc!' and let slip the dogs of war" - Anthony, in Julius >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>Caesar III i. >> >> >> >> >>>>-----Original Message----- >>>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan >>>>Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] >>>>Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 12:06 PM >>>>To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org >>>>Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] SBS Server Question >>>> >>>>Nope. No trusts, no forests. We're the spoiled only PDC that must >>>>hold all the FSMO roles. We can do some funky stuff with pass >>>>through >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>authentication, but no trusts. >>>> >>>>US versus THEM: >>>>http://www.sbslinks.com/Us_v_them.htm >>>> >>>>In SBS 2000/2003 the 'correct' terminology is Yes, an 'additional >>>>domain controller' is supported and not calling it a BDC. >>>> >>>>Member servers are covered by the SBS cals but last I read in the >>>>PUR >>>> >>>> > > > >>>>the additional DC would need server cals. [that's my interpretation >>>>anyway but I get a headache reading that doc in the first place] >>>> >>>>Honestly ...keep in mind that with XPs, they will used cached >>>>credentials and you can log into that profile even if the network is >>>>down. Now comes the fun... who's doing the DHCP? The recommended >>>>way >>>> >>>> > > > >>>>is to have the SBS box to do that...so you still have fun. If the >>>>SBS >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>box goes down, I normally have ways around the temporarily failure >>>>[and even then I can count on one hand the time my network has been >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>affected.... >> >> >> >> >>>>power mostly, then NICs, then switches, and one harddrive falling >>>>off >>>> >>>> > > > >>>>a RAID. Get good equipment [and honestly either reinstall those >>>>OEMs >>>> >>>> > > > >>>>and stay away from those preinstalled versions] and we do just fine. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>Medeiros, Jose wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Hi Susan, >>>>> >>>>>Since we have an SBS MVP on the Active Dir list, let me ask a >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>question. >> >> >> >> >>>>>Can I now make an SBS 2003 server a child domain in an AD 2003 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>forest? >> >> >> >> >>>>>Before you ask why, some one asked me this recently at a Linux >>>>>users >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>group meeting, as his company has several remote offices using SBS >> >> >2003. > > >> >> >> >> >>>>>Also on SBS 4.5, one could have a BDC as a backup, can this also be >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>done with a DC or are you " Sh.T out of luck " when a box fails? >> >> >> >> >>>>>Jose >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx >>>>>List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx >>>>>List archive: >>>>>http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>-- >>Letting your vendors set your risk analysis these days? >>http://www.threatcode.com >> >>List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx >>List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx >>List archive: >>http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ >>List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx >>List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx >>List archive: >>http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ >> >> >> >> >> > >-- >Letting your vendors set your risk analysis these days? >http://www.threatcode.com > >List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx >List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx >List archive: >http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ >List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx >List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx >List archive: >http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > > > -- Letting your vendors set your risk analysis these days? http://www.threatcode.com List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
