VMWare Workstation I think starting with 5.0 has a similar concept to
differencing disks. Usually these things endup in the GSX platform, it just
takes a while. ESX has a differencing disks type story, I forget what its
called, though. From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe One thing that seems a bit silly to me is
if I have my new 64 bit server, GOLIATH, and he’s running 10 VMs with
Windows, then he’s running 10 W2K3 kernels, 10 HALs, 10 __________ (fill
in the blank). There was a concept, sort of filled by NTVDM, that you
could run something in there and if it crashed it didn’t take down the
OS. What if you could run an instance of Exchange in one of those?
Or a DC? VMs are now sort of like having CD images on the network were
for a while – 15 copies of NT4 SP6a, 12 copies of NT4 Option Pack, 25
copies of Adobe Reader, 20 copies of IE5, 15 copies of IE4… you see what
I mean. Run 10 VMs and you have maybe 15 GB of duplicate info on disk.
I hear ESX can mitigate that somewhat… but MS wrote the Windows
code, who could do it better than them? Or maybe I’m way off base
here. ?? Well with this, you can use differencing
disks. I do it now after Dean talked about it. I build one server and then spin
up Differencing disks off of it and it drammatically reduces my disk use. As for everything else, you are describing
running everything on a single machine with virtualization up at the subsystem
level which isn't really virtualization in the same terms of the hardware
virtualization. You still have a single registry and source for device drivers,
etc. From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich Milburn I’m a bit confused as to what she
was trying to say… in the quote below, she says four VMs, but she doesn’t say four instances of
Windows… and she says that they’ll only charge for virtual images
of Windows actually running. I take that to mean that if I have a box
with 10 virtual machines defined but only 4 running at a time, that I only have
to pay for 4? Unless I start a 5th one before I bring one of
the others down? Does it mean that currently I’d have to pay for
10? Or is it that if I am only running 4 I can run them on top of one
purchased copy of Windows Server 2003 R2 EE? One thing that seems a bit silly to me is
if I have my new 64 bit server, GOLIATH, and he’s running 10 VMs with
Windows, then he’s running 10 W2K3 kernels, 10 HALs, 10 __________ (fill
in the blank). There was a concept, sort of filled by NTVDM, that you
could run something in there and if it crashed it didn’t take down the
OS. What if you could run an instance of Exchange in one of those?
Or a DC? VMs are now sort of like having CD images on the network were
for a while – 15 copies of NT4 SP6a, 12 copies of NT4 Option Pack, 25
copies of Adobe Reader, 20 copies of IE5, 15 copies of IE4… you see what
I mean. Run 10 VMs and you have maybe 15 GB of duplicate info on disk.
I hear ESX can mitigate that somewhat… but MS wrote the Windows
code, who could do it better than them? Or maybe I’m way off base
here. ?? --------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of joe Virtual Windows License Simplified <QUOTE> Microsoft also will allow customers to
have four virtual machines running on top of Windows Server 2003 R2 Enterprise
Edition and Windows Server "Longhorn" Datacenter Edition at no extra
cost, Kelly said. </QUOTE> -------APPLEBEE'S
INTERNATIONAL, INC. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE------- |
- RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Movement in licensing over Virtual Inst... Brian Desmond