Shhh, I wasn't going to say anything though I did submit a correction to MS
for the KB.... 


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bernard, Aric
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 4:59 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Disabling "Distributed Link Tracking Server" on
domain Controllers

Might be a problem if the service is disabled, no?

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Almeida Pinto,
Jorge de
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 1:22 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org; ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Disabling "Distributed Link Tracking Server" on
domain Controllers

ehhh... according to the KB article
(http://support.microsoft.com/?id=312403) objects do age out..
 
<QUOTE>
It is not critical that you manually delete the Distributed Link Tracking
objects after you stop the Distributed Link Tracking server service unless
you have to reclaim the disk space that is being consumed by these objects
as quickly as possible. Distributed Link Tracking clients prompt the
Distributed Link Tracking server to update links every 30 days. The
Distributed Link Tracking Server service scavenges objects that have not
been updated in 90 days. 
<QUOTE>
 
 
Jorge

________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of joe
Sent: Mon 11/28/2005 10:10 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Disabling "Distributed Link Tracking Server" on
domain Controllers


They don't age out. You need to delete them. MS cleans up very little in the
directory automatically. Actually I was having an offlist conversation with
one of my MS friends about this topic in regards to the previous FSP
question. When deleting them it isn't too much impact, however, when they
get purged out after the tombstone expires you may find your DCs chugging
away if you have lots. I have seen hundreds of thousands of the filelinks in
a directory before eating up tremendous space.
 
Personally I would hope the AD admins are doing a good job cleaning things
up but for all practical purposes, most places aren't cleaning up and have
no clue that they should be or that they need to be. The hard part, when
SHOULD the system automatically delete something. It comes down it being
able to identify without a shadow of a doubt that the object isn't needed
(say computer objects, FSP, etc) or could be perfectly reconstituted if
necessary in the event of a bad delete.
 
   joe

________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of AD
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 12:52 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Disabling "Distributed Link Tracking Server" on
domain Controllers


Thanks for info the joe and Guido,
 
Because of our politics where I work, modifiying 40000 workstations is not
that easy. Changing 20 DCs on the other hand is a walk in the park.
 
If I do not remove all of the filelinks manually, aren't they going to age
out automatically after 60 days?
 
Thanks
 
Y

________________________________

From: Grillenmeier, Guido
Sent: Mon 28/11/2005 11:46 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Disabling "Distributed Link Tracking Server" on
domain Controllers


nope, no known impact (unless you have specifically deployed an app that
makes use of this service - none of the MS apps do, which is why the service
is disabled by default in Win2003).
 
however, if you want to make sure, why don't you just reverse your disabling
process: first disable all clients, then disable the service on the DCs.
 
Don't forget to cleanup the records underneath your domain's
System\FileLinks\ObjectMoveTable and System\FileLinks\VolumeTable containers
as these will surely contain a lot of garbage.
 
/Guido

________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of AD
Sent: Montag, 28. November 2005 17:40
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] Disabling "Distributed Link Tracking Server" on domain
Controllers


As anyone found any issues in disabling the "distributed link tracking
server" on windows 2000 server domain controllers? 
 
I would like to take a two step approach in disabling this useless service.
First on the DCs and them on all workstations. I was just wondering if there
would be an impact on the clients seeing that cannot communicate with the
server.
 
Thanks
 
Yves 


This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended
recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential
information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied,
disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an
intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any
attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to