I agree, hire a contractor. Get it done right while things are still in their infancy.
:) -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Za Vue Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 1:13 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] W2K & W2K3 environment. Perhaps hiring an experience MCSE contractor will help. Replications and other issues with AD is almost always a start with DNS. You are talking about redoing the who AD structure and loosing accounts and passwords? How large is the company? How will you implement Windows 2003 differently than you did Windows 2000? The languages on the workstations will not be an issue. Jitendra Kalyankar wrote: > Here is scenario that is currently being played in my company. We have > W2K AD in place, we are not using GPOs except one or two. Now suddenly > they (read > managers) realized that > we need to implement GPO extensively. There are issues with current AD > infrastructure like replication is not proper, DNS etc. And other > thing is my company has at least 12 different language that we have to > support on Windows XP OS. > > Now there are two groups in company one is saying go for fixing the > existing infrastructure and second is saying go for W2K3 since the W2K > is almost non-existant. > My question to list > is what would you suggest in this situation. Any insights, inputs are > more than welcome. Also I will keep posted about the decision we (read > managers) make, we are having a meeting with Microsoft for this but > just as heads up I need to understand obvious pitfalls if any. > > > -- > Sincerely, > Jitendra Kalyankar > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
