I didn't say it had to be done, but it is the main reason I have seen (many times) for wanting Outlook on a server. I know it can, and should, be done in many other ways.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 1:42 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Why 64 for Exchange There were ways around having outlook on the SQL Server and still having mail capability for SQL. I don't recall the details as it was a long while ago now and I avoid SQL Server but there was a high availability system I had to put together that used SQL and after we worked out the base OS and SQL configuration we set up the DBAs with their SQL Access (NO Admin Access to the Server, no interactive Access to the server) and they said they needed us to load outlook. We laughed for what seemed like 5 minutes at the request. They figured something else out and got email notifications from the server just fine. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Vander Kooi Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 2:28 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Why 64 for Exchange Just about everyone using SQL Server prior to the release of 2005 was wanting Outlook on their server to enable SQL Mail. Now why anyone would have Exchange and SQL on the same box is beyond me. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 12:54 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] OT: Why 64 for Exchange You Had Me At EHLO... : Exchange 12 and 64-bit: http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2005/12/29/416613.aspx *Co-existence with Outlook *Outlook will co-exist great with E12 on the same server. This is because 32-bit Outlook runs in WOW <http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/win64/ win64/running_32_bit_applications.asp>. Many of you have been asking for this since the 2000 releases where this became unsupported. Who has been asking for this? Insane people? People who don't understand that Outlook is a client app that doesn't belong on a server? That it's another app that can get nailed with vulnerabilities? BTW...speaking of vulns..there's an unpatched WMF vuln .... Microsoft Switzerland Security Blog : Update on WMF 0day: http://blogs.technet.com/ms_schweiz_security_blog/archive/2005/12/29/416 590.aspx -- Letting your vendors set your risk analysis these days? http://www.threatcode.com List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
