|
Ok. Promise. Last adprep question: Does adprep need to be
run from an i386 directory or can it be run on its own? Does it have dependant
files within i386 or is it self-contained? Thanks. From: joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] LOL. It isn't a decimal number though... It is a series of
variable length decimal numbers separated by the period character... Sort of
like an OID 1.2.840.113556.1.4.7000.102.7038 Versioning is a lost art I think though. I am big on
xx.yy.zz.nnnn xx.=major, yy=minor, zz=really minor, nnnn=build. To me... major rev changes for big changes, massive updates
or rewrites or drammatic functional changes. minor is added features, bug
fixes. really minor is output string changes or remarks in the code being
changed, things that don't change the code flow and don't require any
serious testing (I rarely update this one). And build of course is how
many times the bin has been compiled. G:\>filever f:\dev\cpp\adfind\adfind.exe The current release version of adfind for instance has
been compiled 785 times. Well actually that is incorrect, it has compiled 785
times since V01.08.00. There was a little bug in the routine I had been using
to increment the counter and it was resetting on every new minor version rev.
If I follow the average I am probably off by 250-300 compile build numbers but
I expect it is less than that because as the complexity grew in versions >15
the number of compiles between releases went up due to testing and bug hunting.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's a common source of confusion. Ask a user if version 1.4.4 is newer or older than 1.4.3.4
:) Some say "34>4 therefore the latter is newer"
some say "4>3 therefore the former is newer" neil PS The purist in me would say that without a leading 0, the
196 below looks like 1 thousand 9 hundred and 60 and 1960>1830. it's all
about justification, when dealing with the decimal notation :) From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe Ah don't worry about it, I figured you were just
disconnected there when I saw the first question at all. That is why I counted
it out. :) From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Noah Eiger Oh (blush) Don’t mind me. I’m just over here re-learning that whole
tens, hundreds, thousands, etc thing. Ugh! (eyes roll skyward, head shakes) ;-) Sorry for the wasted bandwidth. From: joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] one thousand eight hundred and thirty is greater than one
hundred ninety six. The SP1 version is the most recent and highest version of
adprep. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 ... 1826 1827 1828 1829 1830 1831 1832 1833 1834 1835 ... joe From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Noah Eiger yes From: joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Are you asking if 1830 < 196 ? From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Noah Eiger Hi- I am
preparing to upgrade a W2k domain to W2k3. I want to use the latest version of
ADPrep. I have found the following info and am confused: For
ADPrep on the following - From Windows Server 2003 CD:
5.2.3790.0
July 22, 2004, 9:07:08 AM from WindowsServer2003-KB889101-SP1-x86-ENU.exe:
5.2.3790.1830
November 07, 2005, 5:48:59 PM listed
in MSKB / Hotfix 324392
5.2.3790.196 July
23, 2004, 9:04 Am I
reading that correctly: the one from SP1 is a lower version and later date than
the one in the hotfix? Which one is the “latest”? Thanks. --
nme -- -- -- -- -- PLEASE
READ: The information contained in this email is confidential and intended
for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not an intended recipient
of this email please notify the sender immediately and delete your copy
from your system. You must not copy, distribute or take any further action
in reliance on it. Email is not a secure method of communication and Nomura
International plc ('NIplc') will not, to the extent permitted by law, accept
responsibility or liability for (a) the accuracy or completeness of, or
(b) the presence of any virus, worm or similar malicious or disabling code
in, this message or any attachment(s) to it. If verification of this email
is sought then please request a hard copy. Unless otherwise stated this
email: (1) is not, and should not be treated or relied upon as, investment
research; (2) contains views or opinions that are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of NIplc; (3) is intended for
informational purposes only and is not a recommendation, solicitation or offer
to buy or sell securities or related financial instruments. NIplc does
not provide investment services to private customers. Authorised and regulated
by the Financial Services Authority. Registered in no.
1550505 VAT No. 447 2492 35. Registered Office: 1 -- -- |
- RE: [ActiveDir] ADPrep Version Questions Noah Eiger
- RE: [ActiveDir] ADPrep Version Questions joe
- RE: [ActiveDir] ADPrep Version Questions Gil Kirkpatrick
- Re: [ActiveDir] ADPrep Version Questions Jeremy Olson
