I would highly discourage against using cached mode for roaming
profiles. Just imagine the network resources they would be hogging up
when they log onto a different computer and not to mention HDD space. We
definitely have disable cached mode for roaming profiles. 

-Nav 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Danny
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 3:43 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Roaming Profiles

I agree... but what about OST files - Outlook cached mode.  Is anyone
excluding the OST from the roaming profile?  If so, a new OST will need
to be downloaded at each computer the user logs into.  Most are
100-300MB.  Which is the lesser evil. :)

...D

On 2/3/06, Thommes, Michael M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> As just another piece of this, users sometimes just throw stuff on 
> their "desktop" since they don't know any better or because that might

> be the first location that shows up during a save operation.  The 
> desktop is obviously included as part of the profile, leading to
bloated sizes.
>
>
>
> Mike Thommes
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Molkentin, 
> Steve
> Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 8:45 AM
> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Roaming Profiles
>
>
>
> I too am a fan of local profile, but I do not think that directly 
> addresses Frank's issues...
>
>
>
> A couple of jobs ago at a school we used roaming profiles exclusively 
> - made sense in our scenario. There was still at least 3-4 staff on a 
> bad day that needed their profile reconfig-ed (all students used a
mandatory profile).
> Bottom line - use GPO's to limit the size of the user "dumping" 
> grounds, and/or redirect them. It's amazing how your profile shrink 
> dramatically when you don't allow users to store their files as a part

> of their profile, you don't copy their IE cache, and redirect a couple
of other folders.
>
>
>
> I feel for you Frank, as with users with profiles in excess of, say, 
> 20 MB - with your links speeds, I am amazed that you do not experience

> more problems (but then I am sure it is only the ones that moves sites

> that cause the issues... give them a laptop and make them have local 
> profiles!).  ;)
>
>
>
> My $0.02 inc GST...
>
>
>
> themolk.
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Krenceski, 
> William
> Sent: Friday, 3 February 2006 10:54 PM
> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Roaming Profiles
>
> I personally avoid roaming and mandatory roaming like the plague. One 
> thing you can do is create a DFS Root for the profiles of the users 
> that move around replicate to all of the sites that they visit. I 
> would not recommend doing it for everyone else. I would actually stop 
> using roaming for everyone else that does not roam. there are many 
> alternatives to roaming using Group Policies because no matter how you

> look at it you are slowing down the user logon and the network
especially with that many users.
>
>
>
> JMTC
>
>
>
> Bill
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank 
> Abagnale
> Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 4:51 AM
> To: Active
> Subject: [ActiveDir] OT: Roaming Profiles
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
> I have a question regarding Roaming Profiles. Our environment 
> currently have 3500 users which are all roaming profile enabled. Their

> profiles are stored on the local site server. We have approx 56 sites 
> which are all linked by 256-1mb lines.
>
>
> I like the concept of roaming profiles, however some of our users have

> profiles ranging from 5mb - 200mb, some even with 1GB profiles.
>
>
> Because alot of our users log on to different computers at different 
> sites, we are finding issues with corrupted profiles and logon speeds.

> On a few occasions, where a user has been added to a group, the 
> permissions assign to this group are not shown when the users is 
> logged back on. Deleting the profile and recreating fixes this issue 
> but it's quite a time consuming effort.
>
>
> How does everyone deal with roaming profiles if used? sometimes there 
> are instances where users just want to logon to the PC without their 
> roaming profile so they can remote desktop to their PC. In this 
> situation they have to take their profile across which can take 
> forever depending on the size of profile and link.
>
>
> Any creative ideas? how about using DFS to store the profiles?
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Frank
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
>
> Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this message may 
> be legally privileged and confidential information intended only for 
> the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this

> message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent 
> responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby 
> notified that any release, dissemination, distribution, or copying of 
> this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
> communication in error please notify the author immediately by 
> replying to this message and deleting the original message. Thank you.


--
CPDE - Certified Petroleum Distribution Engineer CCBC - Certified
Canadian Beer Consumer
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to