However, the opposite is true. An OU *is* a container. Look at the schema inheritance.
Thanks, Brian Desmond [EMAIL PROTECTED] c - 312.731.3132 > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Parris > Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 6:23 PM > To: ActiveDir.org > Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] ability to create container objects > not in ADUC > > A container is not an OU. > -----Original Message----- > From: "Olivarez, Sergio J Mr ANOSC/FCBS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:26:22 > To:ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ability to create container objects > not in ADUC > > What kind of container? An OU is a container. > > Thanks... ... ... ... > Sergio J. Olivarez - Contractor > GD-NS > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Thommes, Michael M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 3:11 PM > To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org > Subject: [ActiveDir] ability to create container objects not in ADUC > > Is there a technical reason why the ability to create a new > container is not available in the Active Directory Users and > Computers (ADUC) mmc? > (Sorry if this is a dumb question.) > > Mike Thommes > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
