HAHAHAHAHA ha ha ha ah.... Yeah. Smack.

I concur with Dean, this will be fine from an AD perspective, certainly
nothing special about it. Some people rename it, some people delete it. The
only time it is special is when it is the only one. :)



--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition -
http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean Wells
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 9:27 AM
To: Send - AD mailing list
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Deleting "default-first-site-name" site

Since replication takes place between DCs which logically exist in logical
sites, no, ... not at all -- there's nothing to replicate with.  Regarding
the deletion question; I've deleted it more times than I can count,
sometimes I rename it if I need a new site ... there's nothing "special"
about that object outside of its name (and that _should_ also prove a moot
point.  This of course depends upon the developer, good coding vs. bad
coding ... deleting it may break some joeware tools though -- haha, just
teasing :0)

--
Dean Wells
MSEtechnology
* Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://msetechnology.com

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve 
> Rochford
> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 9:15 AM
> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> Subject: [ActiveDir] Deleting "default-first-site-name" site
> 
> We no longer have any servers in the
> "default-first-site-name" site; should I delete that site? I hadn't 
> really thought it mattered until I was looking at the latency figures 
> with repadmin (shown below for one server).
> Does it matter that no replication has taken place to a site without 
> servers?
>  
> Steve
>  
> Replication Latency for site willesden (wstud3.student.cnwl.ac.uk):
>         Originating Site    Ver    Time Local Update    Time 
> Orig. Update   Latency  Since Last
>       ==================  =====  =================== 
> ===================  ========  ==========
>  Default-First-Site-Name     50  2004-04-07 08:25:58  
> 2001-07-26 15:39:10  23656:46:48  17644:21:27
>                  wembley  58498  2006-04-12 12:25:57
> 2006-04-12 12:25:55  00:00:02  00:21:28
>                  kilburn  58888  2006-04-12 12:10:56
> 2006-04-12 12:06:52  00:04:04  00:36:29
>                willesden  59228  2006-04-12 12:09:50
> 2006-04-12 12:09:50  00:00:00  00:37:35
>                 Madhouse  13173  2006-04-12 12:25:57
> 2006-04-12 12:22:40  00:03:17  00:21:28
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> 
> 


List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to