Re: [ActiveDir] stupid ldap queries

[Matheesha Weerasinghe]

Thanks all for the clarification!

M@

On 4/18/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I did the same after I saw some of the activedir folks post about doing it… J

 

:m:dsm:cci:mvp | marcusoh.blogspot.com

 

---

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lee, Wook
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 4:47 PM

To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org

Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] stupid ldap queries

 

I never understood why Microsoft chose not to index objectclass by default. I indexed it in our directory as soon as we got the go ahead from Microsoft that it was supported. That was years ago.

 

Wook

 

---

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brian Desmond
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 11:50 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] stupid ldap queries

 

No. isMemberOfPartialAttributeSet just means that the attribute is replicated into the GC. Being in the GC does not imply that the attribute is indexed. There's an attribute (I think "isIndexed") which says the attribute should be indexed in the database.

 

Thanks,
Brian Desmond

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

c - 312.731.3132

 

 

---

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matheesha Weerasinghe
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 2:15 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] stupid ldap queries

 

bummer! I meant adfind -schema -f "&(objectclass=attributeschema)(ismemberofpartialattributeset=TRUE)" ldapdisplayname -list

On 4/18/06, Matheesha Weerasinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

sorry that was meant to be adfind -schema -f "&(objectclass=attributeschema)(ismemberofpartialattributeset=T RUE)" ldapdisplayname -list

 

On 4/18/06, Matheesha Weerasinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Thanks for the reply. In that case why does

adfind -schema -f "&(objectclass=attributeschema)(ismemberofpartialattributeset=T RUE)" ldapdisplayname -list

returning objectclass amongs the others? Doesn't this mean objectclass is indexed? The reason I ask is because I wanted to make sure I didn't write stupid ldap queries that load up the server. I am still learning so please be patient with this n00b.

Thanks

M@

On 4/18/06, Brian Desmond < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not sure I understand the question fully, but, no objectClass is not
> indexed. objectCategory is. So if you want to get all users you do:
>
> (&(objectCategory=person)(objectClass=user))
>
> Thanks,
> Brian Desmond
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> c - 312.731.3132
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: ActiveDir-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matheesha Weerasinghe
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 1:00 PM
> > To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> > Subject: [ActiveDir] stupid ldap queries
> >
> > All
> >
> > Could someone please explain how Non-indexed queries (e.g.
> > "objectClass=user") fall in this category? I saw this mentioned in
> some
> > slides by Gil and couldnt quite understand what he meant. Isn't
> > objectclass indexed as part of the partial attribute set?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > M@
> > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> > List archive: http://www.mail-
> > archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
>