Hi Jorge, I don’t mean to hijack this thread but I have also been having an issue with lingeringobjects. I ran your repadmin command shown below on one of the lingering objects I have. For the lingering object I specified, the output lists a GUID (“Originating DC”) that doesn’t exist any more. An “Originating DC” is also the “owner” of the object, right? The member DC/GCs) of the domain that once hosted this “Originating DC” produce a different output from the repadmin /showobjmeta command than the other GCs – namely “Directory Object not found”. If a DC is demoted, the object would be “owned” by one of the remaining DCs. But, if the “owner” is no longer around, the object is garbage. Right?
My question is this – why are lingeringobjects such a “bear” to clean out? It seems to me an admin should be able to use a “repadmin /removelingeringobjects GC: <DN of lingering object>” –type of syntax to take care of all of the GCs at the same time. My TAM has indicated the existence of a “replfix” tool, but I’m not sure how it works. Thoughts/comments?
Mike Thommes
Ps. For any MS folks out there, it would really be helpful to include examples within the repadmin help considering how powerful this command can be. Pps. I think “lingeringobjects” are synonymous with “headache”.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Almeida Pinto, Jorge de
a way to check this is:
REPADMIN /SHOWOBJMETA GC: <DN of lingering object> > OUTPUT.TXT
GC: targets ALL GCs in the forest
For each GC: * you get the metadata of the object if it exists on the GC OR * you get "Directory object not found" if the object does not exist
in addition to this you can wrap a script around this that takes away some manual stuff you must do.
Met vriendelijke groeten / Kind regards, Ing. Jorge de Almeida Pinto Senior Infrastructure Consultant MVP Windows Server - Directory Services
LogicaCMG Nederland B.V. (BU RTINC Eindhoven) ( Tel : +31-(0)40-29.57.777 ( Mobile : +31-(0)6-26.26.62.80 * E-mail : <see sender address>
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
- RE: [ActiveDir] which GC answers? adriaoramos
- RE: [ActiveDir] which GC answers? Thommes, Michael M.
- RE: [ActiveDir] which GC answers? Almeida Pinto, Jorge de
- RE: [ActiveDir] which GC answers? joe
- RE: [ActiveDir] which GC answers? adriaoramos
- RE: [ActiveDir] which GC answers? Almeida Pinto, Jorge de
- RE: [ActiveDir] which GC answers? adriaoramos