I’ve seen O2007 display it both ways, and I think it’s much more Exchange dependent (whether it’s been promoted to MAPI format or continues in Internet format).

 

The list software should not append a plain text footer to a base64 message without encapsulating the original message and rewriting the message to multipart. I’m certain, without tracking the RFC down, that not doing so is an RFC violation.

 

Exchange 2003 sp2 had some changes to its handling of “bad MIME” as well, which could be playing a role with the various experiences being seen by difference people.

 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 7:36 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir][OT] Is there a way to force users to logon to domain?

 

I just verified and OWA is also throwing garbage characters on the end of the message and when looking at the raw stream it is the list banner.

 

How is O2K7 displaying it?

 

Anyone understand what the full spec is for a message is and how to (or if you can) mix MIME with plain text? I expect either the plain text banner isn't allowed or the list software isn't modifying the header properly for it to tell the clients to expect it.

 

  joe

 

 

 

Here is Al's message straight from POP without interpretation:

 

 

retr 39
+OK
Received: from mail.activedir.org ([12.168.66.190]) by mbx01.joeware.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211);
         Mon, 15 May 2006 16:44:34 -0400
Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.234] by mail.activedir.org with ESMTP
  (SMTPD32-8.15) id A6B67EC012E; Mon, 15 May 2006 16:38:14 -0400
Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i30so871233wra
        for <
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org>; Mon, 15 May 2006 13:38:12 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=otNmqTOJtu6h3lzy946aXK9yGTM5JFr0xZLRCRvkC4134GXBlEVFGTm01oR6Q0alNwcgsKlCdGaf7Oc0P7XzMRmR5td5nR1iLsJQ+rx/bxz1c1RTzynDUZSfLeogbMBIzdfTwsmUbAV2+gfnxk19fHg0GT0mFn8dk97+KotFwW
M=
Received: by 10.64.10.15 with SMTP id 15mr2454953qbj;
        Mon, 15 May 2006 13:38:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.65.253.12 with HTTP; Mon, 15 May 2006 13:38:12 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 16:38:12 -0400
From: "Al Mulnick" <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Is there a way to force users to logon to domain?
In-Reply-To: <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Precedence: bulk
Sender:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 May 2006 20:44:34.0134 (UTC) FILETIME=[5F845760:01C67860]

 

SSB0aGluayB5b3UndmUgc2VlbiBzZXZlcmFsIHdheXMgb2YgYWNoaWV2aW5nIHNvbWV0aGluZyBz
aW1pbGFyIHRvCndoYXQgeW91J3ZlIGFza2VkIGZvci4gIEJ1dCBJJ20gY3VyaW91cyBhcyB0byB3
aGF0IHlvdSByZWFsbHkgd2FudCB0bwphY2NvbXBsaXNoLiAgWW91J3ZlIHB1dCBzb21ldGhpbmcg
dmVyeSBzcGVjaWZpYywgYnV0IHdoYXQgbWFrZXMgeW91CndhbnQgdG8gZm9yY2UgdGhlIGxvZ29u
PyAgV2hhdCdzIHRoZSBiYWNrc3Rvcnk/CgpBbAoKT24gNS8xNS8wNiwgSm9lIExhZ3JlY2EgPGxh
Z3JlY2FAZ21haWwuY29tPiB3cm90ZToKPiBJcyB0aGVyZSBhIHdheSB0byBmb3JjZSB1c2VycyB0
byBsb2dvbiB0byBkb21haW4sIG9yIHRvIGRpc2FibGUgbG9naW5nIGludG8KPiBsb2NhbCBjb21w
dXRlciBhY2NvdW50cyB2aWEgR1BPPwo+Cj4gVGhhbmtzLgo+Cg==
List info   :
http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
.

 

 

 

 

 

--

O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm 

 

 

 


From: joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 7:28 PM
To: 'ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir][OT] Is there a way to force users to logon to domain?

Al is sending from GMAIL.

 

It appears that GMAIL is mime encoding the messages, and then the list attaches the plain text banner on it and the whole decodes incorrectly. Outlook pre-2007 pukes (probably exceptions out of the rendering phase) and OWA, O2K7, and Thunderbird seem to read it fine but with the possibility of bad characters. If I had to guess, I would guess the bad characters are the plain text banner being decoded as MIME.

 

--

O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm 

 

 

 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ulf B. Simon-Weidner
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 6:39 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Is there a way to force users to logon to domain?

What about the origin - are they created using OL2k7? If so must be a new bug - I was using a bit older version for quite a while (and everything was readable), but it almost corupted my mailstore - so I switched temporarily back.

Gruesse - Sincerely,

Ulf B. Simon-Weidner

  Profile & Publications:   http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile="">   
  Weblog:
http://msmvps.org/UlfBSimonWeidner
  Website: http://www.windowsserverfaq.org

 

 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Murray
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 12:10 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Is there a way to force users to logon to domain?

I have a rule that auto-deletes Al’s emails as a matter of course.  J

 

I can confirm what others have said – that the emails are visible in Outlook 2007.   Still checking to see if there is a way to resolve this on the list server side, but haven’t found anything yet.

 

Tony

 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Tuesday, 16 May 2006 9:42 a.m.
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Is there a way to force users to logon to domain?

 

Crap, more blank emails from Al. Al, use hotmail or something. ;)

 

--

O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm 

 

 

 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al Mulnick
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 4:38 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Is there a way to force users to logon to domain?

This communication, including any attachments, is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not read it - please contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not copy or use any part of this communication or disclose anything about it. Thank you. Please note that this communication does not designate an information system for the purposes of the Electronic Transactions Act 2002.

Reply via email to