Why did you create two domains in the first place!.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Ajay Kumar
Sent: Mon 29/05/2006 06:08
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Cc:
Subject: [ActiveDir] Regarding Exchange problem
On 5/29/06, Ajay Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Susan,
Thanks for your support giving me details.
One more thing I want to know, I have just installed win2k3
exchange server on 2k3 parent root server and I made child domain in a forest.
I have created mailbox user on both domain, But when I send
mails from child domain users its ask for authentication and Global catalog
can't be contected.But when I send mails through parent mailbox user in same
domain (parent) its works.
Pls suggest me what I have to do to make mailing between child
and parent doamin ? ?
Regards,
Ajay
On 5/29/06, Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] <
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote:
.. well let me throw this back to you.. what do you
want in terms of
features? What's the reason for the question?
Is it from a "I'm an admin migrating from 2k to 2k3 so
how much new
stuff do I need to learn".. or is it "we're deploying a
new server" or
is it "we're thinking of upgrading"
Okay so here we are in 2006... to me deploying a 6 year
old anything
(because we all know that while Exchange 2000 is
'called' 2000.. the
bulk of that code was written when Prince was still
dancing around and
partying like it was 1999 and even earlier. So first
and foremost.. to
me.. the question is not.. "what's the difference
between 2000 and 2003"
but rather.....
Do I upgrade/new deploy 2003 now or wait until the
Exchange 2007 with
Monad and all that stuff comes out?
In my mind if you are doing a new deployment... 2000 is
dead in my
mind. It's not even worth the consideration.
If your are currently on NT... that's even more dead as
it's officially
dead from a tech support standpoint. And there's
probably a budgetary
reason or some stupid line of business (probably an
accounting
application) that won't support the upgrade.
So the question back at you is.. what are you using
now? What are your
needs that aren't being met now?
I already told you why Exchange 2003 sp2 in terms of
features is the way
to go for a Standard box
1. 75 gigs of storage
2. Exchange IMF v2
3. Mobility security pack/remote wipe/ I don't have to
install some
Blackberry software... we just buy Mobile 3 or 5 phones
4. Better security/permissions/ etc.
5. Outlook over http
6. OWA more near Outlookishy
I include the better recoverability as part of that
"feature" list as
well. And a feature for me on 2003 versus 2000 is the
"community" of
2003. I can't remember a dang thing at all about the
NT platform and
starting to lose 2k info. So I want to stay in the
'sweet spot' of
community and support.
Now in terms of Exchange 2007.... we're going to be set
free of those
x86/32 bit limitations and up on the 64 bit
platform... so you'll need
to hardware proof yourself. If you are on 2000 right
now.. and are
looking to upgrade right now to 2003... should the firm
wait for 2007?
Boy I can't tell you that.... that's something that
you'll need to
decide for your organization.
If on NT... get on 2k3.
If on 2000.. we're starting to get to that ..hmmmm....
are we getting to
that time frame that maybe we need to wait for 2007 if
we are willing to
be an early adopter and jump soon after it ships and
not wait for
Exchange 2007 sp1?
But I'm not an unbiased person here.. I have Software
Assurance so it's
already proven that I'm insane.
But I'm still not sure of what's the reason for the
question? As an
admin point of view ..the System Manager between the 2k
and 2k3 looks
pretty close to one another.. it's the Monad era stuff
in Exchange 2007
that will be the learning curve era for me.
Ajay Kumar wrote:
> Susan Bradley,
>
> Can U tell me different in exchnage *in term of
feature* ?.
> And thanks for giving me details in same.
>
>
> Regards,
> Ajay
>
>
> On 5/29/06, *Dave Wade* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>
> I usually answer "3" to questions like this.....
Why? Well its too
> general an open ended for a list like this. You
know whats
> important in your deployemnt, we can only guess.
So:-
>
> 1. If you want general info there is a wealth of
information on
> the MS web site, read it taking care to
concentrate on the bits
> that you are interested in.
>
> 2, If you are considering an upgrade describe
your existing system
> and ask whats in it for you, or highlight areas
of concern
>
> 3. If you are considering a new deployment,
deploy 2003.
>
> Dave Wade
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > on behalf of Ajay
Kumar
> Sent: Sun 28/05/2006 07:00
> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
<mailto:ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org >
> Cc:
> Subject: [ActiveDir] Different between Exchange
2000 and 2003
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Can any one pls tell me what's deffernet
between Exchange
> 2000 and 2003.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Ajay.
>
>
>
>
**********************************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the individual or
entity to whom they
> are addressed. As a public body, the Council may
be required to
> disclose this email, or any response to it,
under the Freedom of
> Information Act 2000, unless the information in
it is covered by
> one of the exemptions in the Act.
>
> If you receive this email in error please notify
Stockport
> e-Services via [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and then permanently
remove
> it from your system.
>
> Thank you.
>
> http://www.stockport.gov.uk
<http://www.stockport.gov.uk/>
>
**********************************************************************
>
>
>
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
<<winmail.dat>>
