Right...good point. In the case of the memberOf attribute, I bind to the group and do an Add.
Teo
On 6/2/06, Almeida Pinto, Jorge de <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
watch out for linked attributes (back-links and forward links)
when exporting info from e.g. user objects you will get for example the memberOf attribute. However, you will not be able to write it back (because it is owned by the system) as for that you need to write the corresponding member attribute of the group specified in the memberOf attribute of the user
step 12 from http://support.microsoft.com/kb/840001/ <http://support.microsoft.com/kb/840001/>
Met vriendelijke groeten / Kind regards,
Ing. Jorge de Almeida Pinto
Senior Infrastructure Consultant
MVP Windows Server - Directory Services
LogicaCMG Nederland B.V. (BU RTINC Eindhoven)
( Tel : +31-(0)40- 29.57.777
( Mobile : +31-(0)6-26.26.62.80
* E-mail : <see sender address>
________________________________
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Teo De Las Heras
Sent: Fri 2006-06-02 19:52
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Reanimate or Authoritatively Restore objects
Joe,
Thanks for the feedback. I wrote a script to do an ldifde daily and set it as a scheduled task. I wrote another script that will take the information that ldifde exports to re-populate the re-animated objects.
Teo
On 5/31/06, joe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It depends on what info you have captured for the objects, what info is scrubbed in the tombstone, and how you personally feel about it.
I personally prefer to reanimate objects over restoring them. When you do a restore there is always a possibility you can hurt yourself pretty bad. Reanimation is much less dangerous but if the info isn't there and you don't know what to populate manually and you need the old info, you don't have a lot of choice.
joe
________________________________
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] On Behalf Of Teo De Las Heras
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 12:08 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] Reanimate or Authoritatively Restore objects
In reference to the following KB article:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/840001/
In a Domain and Forest that is at a 2003 functional level, is it better to reanimate objects from the deleted items container or authoritatively restore them?
This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.
