The set of passwords that *can* be sent down to the RODC is controlled by password replication policy. The passwords are sent down by RODC’s request, but the hub also checks whether the user (whose pwd is being requested) actually attempted to authenticate at RODC (the hub can induce this info from the traffic is sees). The pwd hash is sent down only if both are satisfied: pwd policy allows it and the user actually attempted to logon there.

 

Pwd policy is “empty” by default, i.e. nobody is in “allowed to reveal” list. It is admin’s responsibility to populate this list. We might have some UI that helps with this process.

 

Once the hash is sent down, there’s no way to remove it from RODC, basically because we do not trust that RODC will remove it, even if instructed to do so. Therefore, the only way to “expire” the hash is to change the password. We store the list of passwords that were sent down to RODC in an attribute on the RODC computer object (the hub DC updates the list when it sends a pwd). So, if the RODC is stolen, you can enumerate whose passwords were down there, and make these users reset their passwords. There’s a constructed attribute that returns only the users whose *current* passwords appear to be on the RODC.

 

WRT what data is sent down – currently, we send everything, sans a handful of “secret” attributes, which are controlled by pwd replication policy. There’s a DCR to be able to configure the list of attributes that can go down to RODC (aka RODC PAS), but it is not yet clear if we will get it done or not.  Note that the client data access story on RODC becomes quite convoluted because you don’t know if you are seeing the whole object or only a subset of it. We do not normally issue referrals due to “partial reads”.

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 8:22 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Read-Only Domain Controller and Server Core

 

RODC stores password hashes only for a pre defined list of users and they are not stored on a permanent basis. [I'm unclear how the latter is achieved.]

 

The goal is such that if the RODC were removed from the office then no password secrets could be extracted from that machine.

 

 

neil

 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al Mulnick
Sent: 28 July 2006 16:08
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Read-Only Domain Controller and Server Core

The part that makes me wonder about the "story" is if it stores no secrets is the server doing anything for me? Is there a point to deploying the server in a remote office other than just being able to point to it in the closet and say, "see, I do to earn my paycheck!"  

 

I'm sure there's more, but I don't yet know which parts are public information and which are NDA.

 

Can you tell I'm concerned about the story being created? I like stories; don't get me wrong.  But I'm concerned that the story being spun up might be missing the mark and lead a few people astray.

 

Safe to note that there are some features that differentiate the RODC from a NT4 BDC and that make it appealing in some cases.

But if it actually does not store anything locally, ever, then I'm not sure it's worth the time to deploy one now is it?

 

Al

 



 

On 7/27/06, Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

FYI:

http://blogs.msdn.com/jolson/archive/2006/07/27/679801.aspx


         Read-Only Domain Controller and Server Core




List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx

 

PLEASE READ: The information contained in this email is confidential and

intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not an intended

recipient of this email please notify the sender immediately and delete your

copy from your system. You must not copy, distribute or take any further

action in reliance on it. Email is not a secure method of communication and

Nomura International plc ('NIplc') will not, to the extent permitted by law,

accept responsibility or liability for (a) the accuracy or completeness of,

or (b) the presence of any virus, worm or similar malicious or disabling

code in, this message or any attachment(s) to it. If verification of this

email is sought then please request a hard copy. Unless otherwise stated

this email: (1) is not, and should not be treated or relied upon as,

investment research; (2) contains views or opinions that are solely those of

the author and do not necessarily represent those of NIplc; (3) is intended

for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation, solicitation or

offer to buy or sell securities or related financial instruments. NIplc

does not provide investment services to private customers. Authorised and

regulated by the Financial Services Authority. Registered in England

no. 1550505 VAT No. 447 2492 35. Registered Office: 1 St Martin's-le-Grand,

London, EC1A 4NP. A member of the Nomura group of companies.

Reply via email to