Security bulletin 06-040.. out yesterday.
Put it on a test priority folks.
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms06-040.mspx
John Strongosky wrote:
06-040?? What is this?
john
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Susan
Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
*Sent:* Tuesday, August 08, 2006 5:17 PM
*To:* ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
*Subject:* Re: [ActiveDir] FMSO roles split, patch question.
The main thing it to test and approve 06-040 and get that one on the
fast track IMHO.
Deji Akomolafe wrote:
It doesn't matter.
Sincerely,
_____
(, / | /) /) /)
/---| (/_ ______ ___// _ // _
) / |_/(__(_) // (_(_)(/_(_(_/(__(/_
(_/ /)
(/
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.akomolafe.com <x-excid://32770000/uri:http://www.akomolafe.com> -
we know IT
*-5.75, -3.23*
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
Yesterday? -anon
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* John Strongosky
*Sent:* Tue 8/8/2006 4:49 PM
*To:* ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
*Subject:* [ActiveDir] FMSO roles split, patch question.
We have our FMSO roles split between 2 dc's. They are Schema
Master/Domain Tree Operator on 1 and on 2, the roles PDC
Emulator/Rid Pool/Intrastate on the other. After I apply the patches
from Microsoft what is the beat practices for the boot order...or
does it matter?
1. Remote DC/GC's first
2. no. 1
3. then no 2.
thanks
--
Letting your vendors set your risk analysis these days?
http://www.threatcode.com
If you are a SBSer and you don't subscribe to the SBS Blog... man ... I will
hunt you down...
http://blogs.technet.com/sbs
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ :
http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive:
http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
