Hi Neil and Joe,

 

what I meant is that I'd evaluate a price-tag of third-party software
against waiting for the next release and deploying the first machine (if
something would be fixed / easier with a single installation of the next
OS).

 

So:

1.       Get the price for the 3rd Party Product

2.       Evaluate if you'd use it with the next version

3.       Evaluate how many machines you'd have to deploy to get the feature

4.       Judge how long it'll take you until the next version is RTM + you
are ready to roll out #3s amount of machines

5.       Compare if you are willing to invest #1 amount of money to get the
feature before #4

 

So if a 3rd Party Vendor is telling me that the time is right to get their
product, I'd still evaluate upper factors before making a decision. If it's
a special offer right now it might affect the math ;-)

Gruesse - Sincerely, 

Ulf B. Simon-Weidner 

  Profile & Publications:
<blocked::http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile=35E388DE-4885-4308-B489-F
2F1214C811D>
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile=35E388DE-4885-4308-B489-F2F1214C811
D   
  Weblog:  <blocked::http://msmvps.org/UlfBSimonWeidner>
http://msmvps.org/UlfBSimonWeidner
  Website:  <blocked::http://www.windowsserverfaq.org/>
http://www.windowsserverfaq.org

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Montag, 11. Dezember 2006 09:52
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quest Recovery Manager

 

I disagree with your disagreement :)

 

How long do you wait? Do you wait until Intel releases a new chip too? What
about the version after Longhorn?? There are always new technologies on the
horizon - my company needs solutions to its problems now, based upon the
technology it uses today.

 

When assessing solutions, I look at the relevant roadmaps and how future
proof that solution might be as well as the solution provider's track record
in the space studied - but the major decision points always rest with its
suitability to the present situation.

 

neil

 

  _____  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ulf B.
Simon-Weidner
Sent: 10 December 2006 12:06
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quest Recovery Manager

I do disagree since we might have other withes, issues, possibilities with
Longhorn, so I'd wait when spending a lot of money.

 

Gruesse - Sincerely, 

Ulf B. Simon-Weidner 

  Profile & Publications:
<BLOCKED::http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile=35E388DE-4885-4308-B489-F
2F1214C811D>
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile=35E388DE-4885-4308-B489-F2F1214C811
D   
  Weblog:  <BLOCKED::http://msmvps.org/UlfBSimonWeidner>
http://msmvps.org/UlfBSimonWeidner
  Website:  <BLOCKED::http://www.windowsserverfaq.org/>
http://www.windowsserverfaq.org

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jackson Shaw
Sent: Donnerstag, 7. Dezember 2006 00:51
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quest Recovery Manager

 

It is an excellent time to purchase Quest software.

 

(In my opinion, my views do not represent my employer J J)

 

  _____  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Desmond
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 1:54 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quest Recovery Manager

 

Yeah. Sit down with your team and figure out what it is you need - must
have, would like to have, and nice to have. Then, tell all the vendors you
want a little webinar (they love these), and then compare your notes after
each/all of them again. Rule out any ones now that don't do the trick


Then go get ready to have it shoved way up your ass when they give you the
pricing. Then you can suggest (if they haven't already) that they come
discuss it in further and plan on a lunch/dinner or two on their dime while
you further discuss how expensive their stuff is and what they can do for
you to make it more attractive. The Quest guys told me the other day they
had a lot of leeway on some pricing for one of my clients so I'm wondering
if this is the end of the year for the salesmen and they need to make their
year this month (if so this is an excellent time to buy Quest software).

 

Now that said, I've worked in a few large shops, and we haven't had any of
this frilly fancy shit. It's expensive, I hate the per head/per seat/per
whatever pricing, and frankly all I think it does is idiot proof what's
already there. Rather than having something do it for you, why don't you
learn how it does it, because then you'll be smarter, and you can go get a
new better job with your new found talents.

 

That said there is some cool shit from quest and NetIQ and those guys - I'm
into the change control/management stuff in shops where there are too many
cooks in the kitchen. Quest's migration stuff is of course great if you can
afford it.

 

Thanks,

Brian Desmond

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

c - 312.731.3132

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Myrick, Todd
(NIH/CC/DCRI) [E]
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 3:23 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quest Recovery Manager

 

I don't think there are many independent rankings out there.  You have to
figure that Windows ITPro and SearchWindows are probably the easiest sources
to get access to online, but they are influenced by ad dollars sometimes.
It is possible that Burton Group and possibly Gartner have done some
research.. But I doubt it.  I know that directions on Microsoft hasn't
covered it.  It is a pretty niche topic.

 

I think the best way to approach this is to have a good old fashion bake off
of the technologies.  Depending how big a player you are, you can probably
get Quest, Netpro, Veritas, and Commvalt to step-up.  I would say that all
the technologies are pretty stable at the moment; there isn't a lot of
innovation going on anymore, so it is pretty hard to make a mistake choosing
one of these products.

 

 

Todd

  _____  

From: Tim Onsomu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 2:06 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org; ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quest Recovery Manager

 

Does anybody know what independent rankings look like for AD DR tools?




-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Gil Kirkpatrick
Sent: Wed 12/6/2006 9:59 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quest Recovery Manager

<shamelss plug>

NetPro has an AD data recovery product called RestoreADmin that competes
very well with the Quest product. It's solves the AD object recovery
problem nicely.

See http://www.netpro.com/products/restoreadmin/index.cfm.

</shameless plug>

-gil

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 7:37 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quest Recovery Manager

Todd, thanks for your insight. Good points to think about.


James Masters
Systems Architecture and Engineering
The Kroger Co.
Office: (859) 363-2346
Cell:    (859) 653-8644


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Myrick, Todd
(NIH/CC/DCRI) [E]
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 9:14 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quest Recovery Manager

Same here... Good stuff.

To be fair though, most of the major AD players have these tools now.
The thing about the Quest (Aelita) tool was its use of their own APIs to
address issues like Domain Local Groups etc.  I haven't kept up with the
latest versions so I am not sure what direction they have gone since
2003.
Latest information I remember was they offered you the option to use the
MS API methods for recovery, or their special brew for more advanced
recovery options.

Now if put some extra effort into your query, you might get this thread
nice and hot, and generate input from people like Stuart Kwan discussing
supportability issues using the various recovery methods, Guido &
Vladimir
discussing in great depth the inherent problems of group recovery,
various
opinions on how to use isolates sites with rubber chickens, MIIS, ADAM
to
reanimate deleted objects (This seems to be a favorite topic of Gil's to
use to fill in spots at DEC)... did I forget anyone... hmm maybe Robbie
might take time away from work on his fields medal or latest cookbook to
write you a Monad shell script that Joe will find a way to compile into
a
.exe to execute from a ADFIND query pipe. 

In all seriousness though, when evaluating DR feature for AD you will
have
a lot of things to consider, technologies being just one.  The nature of
the type of AD objects you want to recover and in what state should be
considered (Groups, GPO's, etc, attribute data).  How much time you want
to dedicate to this operation?  How much you want to spend? And who will
support you if the recovery operations fail or seem to cause more
problems.

If you are looking just to recover deleted users, the various free tools
out there will do just fine.

I highly recommend that you start your DR project today by just using
the
good'old MS backup utility at a minimum to make a MST formatted backup
of
the system state and data from a domain controller in each of your
domains
you think has the most current AD data in your organization.  That
pretty
much guarantees you can recover every object given that you have the
data
in some backup.

And to all the people I mentioned above.  Happy Holidays... and New
Year.

Todd

-----Original Message-----
From: Day, James (NPS)
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 8:03 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Cc: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Quest Recovery Manager

Hi James

We bought this when it was an Aelita tool and loved the product - it
pretty much paid for itself in one step the second month we were using
it.
The product is still good but I have nothing good to say about Quest
support (but I could complain for hours about it if I am allowed to).

There are a couple of other similar ones that may also be worth.

Regards;

James R. Day
Active Directory Core Team
Office of the Chief Information Officer
National Park Service
202-354-1464
202-230-2983 (CEL)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




             [EMAIL PROTECTED]

             ger.com

             Sent by:
To
             [EMAIL PROTECTED]         ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org

             ail.activedir.org
cc



Subject
             12/05/2006 05:11          [ActiveDir] Quest Recovery
Manager 
             PM EST





             Please respond to

             [EMAIL PROTECTED]

                tivedir.org









Does anybody have anything particularly good or bad to say about Quest's
Recovery Manager product?

We are evaluating it for an 2 forests, and 3 domains.

As always, thanks for all of your insight and expertise.

-James
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/


List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/

PLEASE READ: The information contained in this email is confidential and 

intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not an intended 

recipient of this email please notify the sender immediately and delete your


copy from your system. You must not copy, distribute or take any further 

action in reliance on it. Email is not a secure method of communication and 

Nomura International plc ('NIplc') will not, to the extent permitted by law,


accept responsibility or liability for (a) the accuracy or completeness of, 

or (b) the presence of any virus, worm or similar malicious or disabling 

code in, this message or any attachment(s) to it. If verification of this 

email is sought then please request a hard copy. Unless otherwise stated 

this email: (1) is not, and should not be treated or relied upon as, 

investment research; (2) contains views or opinions that are solely those of


the author and do not necessarily represent those of NIplc; (3) is intended 

for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation, solicitation or


offer to buy or sell securities or related financial instruments. NIplc 

does not provide investment services to private customers. Authorised and 

regulated by the Financial Services Authority. Registered in England 

no. 1550505 VAT No. 447 2492 35. Registered Office: 1 St Martin's-le-Grand, 

London, EC1A 4NP. A member of the Nomura group of companies. 

Reply via email to