Hi, This is a continued discussion about dynamically reintroduce the master after a failure, the original discussion is here.
http://forums.activemq.org/posts/list/468.page#1653 James idea about pausing the slave and synchronize two DBs is better than stopping the slave and doing a manual sync. But I doubt this is acceptable to us, as in real production environment, we won't be able to pause the only message broker unless for a really short interval (I guess have to less than one minute otherwise the end user will notice it). Maybe a broker-broker synchronization protocol is the ultimate solution, just we are not sure how to get there. Any recommendation or suggestions? Thanks Ning
