Cross posting to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so the Geronimo team is involved in discussions regarding ActiveMQ integration, as I don't think the missing gbean support in ActiveMQ 4.0 has been discussed on the Geronimo dev list.

The missing gbean support was a surprise to me as I wasn't expecting ActiveMQ 4.0 to be missing the functionality that it had in ActiveMQ 3.2.1 currently used by Geronimo. I was expecting 4.0 to almost be a drop in replacement, except for the change of package names. I was hoping to play with a 4.0-RCx release with Geronimo.

I am concerned about Geronimo staying with a 3.2.x release when it has been mentioned that 4.0 should be more stable and a number of bugs in 3.2.x have only been fixed in the 4.0 code.

Hiram, when you have an idea of the effort required to implement the GBeans support ActiveMQ 4.x let's discuss time frames for Geronimo to moving to an ASF hosted ActiveMQ release.

Regards,

John

Hiram Chirino wrote:
Hi John,

Yep it will be needed. We need to update it so that it works with the new 4.x way of updating stuff. Should not be to hard to get it working again now that 4.x has stabilized. What would be nice is to have a better set of gbeans than what we had with ActiveMQ 3.x. The 3.x gbeans allow you to configure about 5% of the options that activemq allows you to tweak using the standard activemq.xml files. I was hoping we could improve this for 4.x.

Regards,
Hiram

On Mar 21, 2006, at 1:33 AM, John Sisson wrote:

What needs to be done to Geronimo to use ActiveMQ 4.0-RC1 when it is available for testing?

I noticed the activemq-gbean module (that was available in previous ActiveMQ releases used by Geronimo) is under the sandbox with some svn log comments about it not being operational.
Won't this be needed for embedding ActiveMQ in Geronimo?

Thanks,

John




Reply via email to