I liked Hiram's blog today.... http://hiramchirino.com/2006/06/amqp-interesting-start.html
it looks way too early to be able to implement this specification in a JMS provider yet as there's no standard way to map JMS semantics to AMQP yet - which would prevent JMS providers from interoperating - but I'm sure that will come along later. On 6/21/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 ! BTW IMO the spec is still fuzzy. I think they need to clarify it a bit more. But I think it's something we should be able to implement really easy. On 6/20/06, Brian McCallister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > FYI: http://www.infoq.com/news/amq > > AMQP looks to be an attempt at wire protocol specification like > openwire or stomp. > > Probably good for us to look at, though the licensing probably needs > to bounce through [EMAIL PROTECTED] before we do much as it is not > immediately clear if it is okay. I probably is, but I'd love to get > Cliff's opinion. > > -Brian > -- Regards, Hiram Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
-- James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
