+1 120 at LEAST.
On 8/25/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 for 120 characters :)
And Sun coding standards for the rest.
On 8/25/06, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I try to keep the meat of the statement to the first 80 characters
> and if some string goes out to say 200 characters, I don't really
> care. I just don't want to be surprised by some important thing off
> the screen.
>
> -dain
>
> On Aug 24, 2006, at 2:50 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
>
> > I generally do 120 as well :-)
> >
> > -Brian
> >
> > On Aug 24, 2006, at 2:20 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> >
> >> Agreed.
> >> 120 is much more useful :)
> >>
> >> On 8/24/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I think the 80 char limit is antiquated... now that most folks have
> >>> displays that can quite easily display more than 80 columns.
> >>> Limiting lines to 80 tends to force folks to artificially reformat
> >>> code which just uglies things up.
> >>>
> >>> --jason
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Aug 24, 2006, at 1:56 PM, Sepand M wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Hi guys,
> >>> >
> >>> > Do you have a coding style that I should go by?
> >>> > Specifically, do you use the 80 chars/line limit?
> >>> > I see a lot of code that doesn't, so I haven't, but it's
> >>> bugging me
> >>> > more and more by the second.
> >>> >
> >>> > Regards,
> >>> > Sepand
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Cheers,
> >> Guillaume Nodet
>
>
--
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
