On 11/14/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think the main problem is that users will never
download newest versions. IMHO, this would be a bad
idea.
yeah.
On 11/14/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Fritz!
>
> I knew there had to be a reason that I was just not aware of. What do
> you think would be the downsides of not using the special "SNAPSHOT"
> handling that maven provides? What if we tagged our SNAPSHOT builds
> with something like like "DEVELOPMENT" instead of "SNAPSHOT".
>
> I'm guessing that problem would go away, but what other ones would we get?
>
> On 11/14/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is also my experience.
> > If we just use the real version 4.2-SNAPSHOT
> > for example, it should also work and maven
> > should be able to change (*nearly*) all these
> > occurrences when using the release plugin.
> >
> > I say nearly, because in ServiceMix, there are
> > some edge cases where this fail (when including
> > the version in files other than pom.xml like artifacts
> > resources for example).
> >
> > On 11/14/06, Fritz Oconer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I added ${activemq-version} instead of ${project.version} basically as a
> > > workaround for build failures due to differences in timestamp. If we use
> > > ${project.version} then it will require all activemq type artifacts
> > > (specified as <dependency> in the parent pom.xml) to have the same
timestamp
> > > as the parent. This becomes an issue when nightly-build deploy fails after
> > > some of the modules have been deployed causing some activemq modules to
have
> > > different timestamp as the parent. We can change this back to using
> > > project.version but we need to make sure that nightly-build always deploys
> > > successfully or I wonder if there is another workaround for this?
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-956
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Fritz
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Hiram Chirino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 8:48 PM
> > > Subject: ActiveMQ POM
> > >
> > >
> > > > Howdy,
> > > >
> > > > I was wondering if anybody knows why we are using
> > > > "${activemq-version}" instead of "${project.version}" in our ActiveMQ
> > > > poms?? When doing a release build, it's easy to forget that you need
> > > > to updated the version in to places. Can't we just use the
> > > > "${project.version}" variable??
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Hiram
> > > >
> > > > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Guillaume Nodet
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
