Sorry, but I forgot to tell you my clients will be 100% consumers except one.
J On 3/21/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Absolutely; you should be able to make a network of master/slave > brokers. A master/slave pair acts as a logical broker - so you should > be able to network them. > > BTW what kind of load do you expect? Are the 10K clients mostly > consumers or are they all publishing etc? e.g. what kinds of > messages/second are you thinking of. > > Depending on your OS and the hardware you're running it on, a single > broker could deal with 10K clients - its mostly an issue of can the > broker deal with the IO load, the number of threads & mostly the > number of sockets that the broker can deal with; but its likely you'll > want a few less clients per broker - maybe 1-4K per broker. > > James > > On 3/21/06, Javier Leyba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi All > > > > > > I'm planning to use ActiveMQ in a big environment with more than 10 > > thousands clients subscribed to topics. > > > > Obviously, I'll need HA and some kind of load balancing. > > > > I've tested a master/slave architecture and it worked (i've problems > > with my listener now, but it worked). > > > > I've tested a net of workers too and it works balancing data. > > > > But now I've a big problem. If I use a master/slave option, my server > > will be receiving a lot of work, specially when clients starts their > > job at 8am. I really don't know if a broker will work well against > > such heavy load. The way to avoid this is to have a net of brokers > > with n brokers receiving the heavy load in a balanced way, but a net > > of workers give no HA. > > > > Now I think my solution could be a mix of both scenarios and I want to > > ask: Could I make a net of brokers where each broker be a master/slave > > node ? Is this possible ? > > > > Do somebody have another idea to construct my environment ? > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > J > > > > > -- > > James > ------- > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/ >
