On 3/24/06, Jack Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If I'm running on ActiveMQ 3.2.2 then master/slave is not an option, correct?
Yes > I'm using 3.2.2 and the reliable: transport. Is the "randomize=false" > argument available to make sure that I usually hit my master broker? > How do I achieve the "locking out" that you refer to? > > Also, in some testing I did with 3.2.2, it seemed that if journaling > was disabled, and the database became unavailable (simulating mysql > crash), that incoming messages were just lost. Does that sound like > what you'd expect? I can debug further if that surprises you. We should be failing the send() call in those cases -- James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
