With SSL debug on, this is the output from the broker during the failure
(but no stack traces at debug log4j level):

Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3163, READ: TLSv1
Application
Data, length = 16400
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3163, READ: TLSv1
Application
Data, length = 16400
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3163, READ: TLSv1
Application
Data, length = 16400
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3163, READ: TLSv1
Application
Data, length = 16400
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3163, READ: TLSv1
Application
Data, length = 16400
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3163, READ: TLSv1
Application
Data, length = 16400
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3163, READ: TLSv1
Application
Data, length = 16400
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3163, READ: TLSv1
Application
Data, length = 16400
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3163, READ: TLSv1
Application
Data, length = 16400
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3163, READ: TLSv1
Application
Data, length = 16400
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3163, READ: TLSv1
Application
Data, length = 16400
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3163, READ: TLSv1
Application
Data, length = 16400
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3163, READ: TLSv1
Application
Data, length = 16400
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3163, READ: TLSv1
Application
Data, length = 16400
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3163, READ: TLSv1
Application
Data, length = 16400
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3163, READ: TLSv1
Application
Data, length = 16400
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3163, READ: TLSv1
Application
Data, length = 16400
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3163, READ: TLSv1
Application
Data, length = 16400
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3163, READ: TLSv1
Application
Data, length = 16400
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3163, READ: TLSv1
Application
Data, length = 16400
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3163, READ: TLSv1
Application
Data, length = 16400
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3163, READ: TLSv1
Application
Data, length = 16400
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3163, READ: TLSv1
Application
Data, length = 16400
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3163, READ: TLSv1
Application
Data, length = 16400
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3163, READ: TLSv1
Application
Data, length = 16400
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3163, READ: TLSv1
Application
Data, length = 16400
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3163, READ: TLSv1
Application
Data, length = 16400
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3163, READ: TLSv1
Application
Data, length = 16400
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3163, READ: TLSv1
Application
Data, length = 16400
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3163, READ: TLSv1
Application
Data, length = 16400
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3163, READ: TLSv1
Application
Data, length = 16400
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3163, READ: TLSv1
Application
Data, length = 16400
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3163, READ: TLSv1
Application
Data, length = 16400
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3163, READ: TLSv1
Application
Data, length = 16400
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3163, READ: TLSv1
Application
Data, length = 4814
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3163, WRITE: TLSv1
Application
 Data, length = 27
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3175, handling
exception: java
.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3175, handling
exception: java
.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3175, handling
exception: java
.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3175, handling
exception: java
.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3175, handling
exception: java
.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3175, handling
exception: java
.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3175, handling
exception: java
.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3175, handling
exception: java
.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3175, handling
exception: java
.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3175, handling
exception: java
.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3163, called close()
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3163, called
closeInternal(true)
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3163, SEND TLSv1 ALERT: 
warning, description = close_notify
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3163, WRITE: TLSv1
Alert, length = 18
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3163, called close()
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3163, called
closeInternal(true)
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3163, called close()
Socket Connection: /127.0.0.1:61616 -> /127.0.0.1:3163, called
closeInternal(true)

Port 3163 in this instance is my 'server' app (one JMS client), and 3175
the 'client' app. I'm assuming that the socket timeout exceptions are
normal, and part of the Java SSL impl. as they occur at very regular
intervals.

Corresponding 'server' stacktrace is:

WARN [2006-03-28 16:00:37,484] activemq.ActiveMQConnection "Async
exception with no exception listener: java.io.EOFException: Peer
disconnected."
java.io.EOFException: Peer disconnected.
        at
org.apache.activeio.command.AsyncChannelToAsyncCommandChannel$1.onPacket(AsyncChannelToAsyncCommandChannel.java:64)
        at
org.apache.activemq.transport.activeio.PacketAggregatingAsyncChannel.onPacket(PacketAggregatingAsyncChannel.java:59)
        at
org.apache.activeio.packet.async.FilterAsyncChannel.onPacket(FilterAsyncChannel.java:89)
        at
org.apache.activemq.transport.activeio.ActivityMonitor.onPacket(ActivityMonitor.java:42)
        at
org.apache.activeio.adapter.SyncToAsyncChannel.run(SyncToAsyncChannel.java:127)
        at
edu.emory.mathcs.backport.java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:650)
        at
edu.emory.mathcs.backport.java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:675)
        at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)

Cheers,

steve



> BTW is there anything interesting appearing on the broker log whne
> your client dies?
>
> James
>
> On 3/28/06, Steve Barham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Can you give an example of how to enable this debug logging?
>>
>> I've just tried with 4.0-SNAPSHOT rather than -M4, and get this
>> exception:
>>  WARN [2006-03-28 15:44:24,515] activemq.ActiveMQConnection "Async
>> exception with no exception listener: java.io.EOFException: Peer
>> disconnected."
>> java.io.EOFException: Peer disconnected.
>>         at
>> org.apache.activeio.command.AsyncChannelToAsyncCommandChannel$1.onPacket(AsyncChannelToAsyncCommandChannel.java:64)
>>         at
>> org.apache.activemq.transport.activeio.PacketAggregatingAsyncChannel.onPacket(PacketAggregatingAsyncChannel.java:59)
>>         at
>> org.apache.activeio.packet.async.FilterAsyncChannel.onPacket(FilterAsyncChannel.java:89)
>>         at
>> org.apache.activemq.transport.activeio.ActivityMonitor.onPacket(ActivityMonitor.java:42)
>>         at
>> org.apache.activeio.adapter.SyncToAsyncChannel.run(SyncToAsyncChannel.java:127)
>>         at
>> edu.emory.mathcs.backport.java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:650)
>>         at
>> edu.emory.mathcs.backport.java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:675)
>>         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
>>
>> So very similar behaviour...
>>
>> steve
>> >
>> > I am not sure if I can help, but I think I had a similar error in my
>> > experiments with SSL.
>> > It looks like SSL doesn't work so fast or something, try to enable the
>> SSL
>> > debug and see if you can get there a hint. My problem was at the
>> startup,
>> > that the logging took to long and I always got timeout errors.
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> > Von: Steve Barham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > Gesendet: Dienstag, 28. März 2006 16:16
>> > An: [email protected]
>> > Betreff: Final repost: SSL transport failure
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > This is likely to be my last post unless someone has any bright ideas
>> - I
>> > need SSL support for my application to be deployed, and I cannot work
>> > around the following error.
>> >
>> > When I send a large (List of 8000 objects, each of about 10 Strings,
>> > around 10 characters each - serialized size is only 627k) message, I
>> get
>> > the following stacktrace:
>> >
>> > WARN [2006-03-28 15:13:46,140] activemq.ActiveMQConnection "Async
>> > exception with no exception listener: java.io.EOFException: Peer
>> > disconnected."
>> > java.io.EOFException: Peer disconnected.
>> >       at
>> > org.activeio.command.AsyncChannelToAsyncCommandChannel$1.onPacket(AsyncChannelToAsyncCommandChannel.java:65)
>> >       at
>> > org.apache.activemq.transport.activeio.PacketAggregatingAsyncChannel.onPacket(PacketAggregatingAsyncChannel.java:59)
>> >       at
>> org.activeio.FilterAsyncChannel.onPacket(FilterAsyncChannel.java:87)
>> >       at
>> > org.apache.activemq.transport.activeio.ActivityMonitor.onPacket(ActivityMonitor.java:42)
>> >       at
>> > org.activeio.adapter.SyncToAsyncChannel.run(SyncToAsyncChannel.java:150)
>> >       at
>> > edu.emory.mathcs.backport.java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:643)
>> >       at
>> > edu.emory.mathcs.backport.java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:668)
>> >       at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
>> >  WARN [2006-03-28 15:13:46,156] activemq.ActiveMQConnection "Cleanup
>> > failed"
>> > javax.jms.JMSException: Connection closed by remote host
>> >       at
>> > org.apache.activemq.util.JMSExceptionSupport.create(JMSExceptionSupport.java:57)
>> >       at
>> > org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnection.asyncSendPacket(ActiveMQConnection..java:1043)
>> >       at
>> > org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnection.cleanup(ActiveMQConnection.java:1191)
>> >       at
>> > org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnection.transportFailed(ActiveMQConnection..java:1585)
>> >       at
>> > org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnection.onException(ActiveMQConnection.java:1338)
>> >       at
>> > org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportFilter.onException(TransportFilter..java:102)
>> >       at
>> > org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportFilter.onException(TransportFilter..java:102)
>> >       at
>> > org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportFilter.onException(TransportFilter..java:102)
>> >       at
>> > org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityMonitor.onException(InactivityMonitor.java:96)
>> >       at
>> > org.apache.activemq.transport.activeio.ActiveIOTransport$1.onError(ActiveIOTransport.java:71)
>> >       at
>> > org.activeio.command.AsyncChannelToAsyncCommandChannel$1.onPacket(AsyncChannelToAsyncCommandChannel.java:65)
>> >       at
>> > org.apache.activemq.transport.activeio.PacketAggregatingAsyncChannel.onPacket(PacketAggregatingAsyncChannel.java:59)
>> >       at
>> org.activeio.FilterAsyncChannel.onPacket(FilterAsyncChannel.java:87)
>> >       at
>> > org.apache.activemq.transport.activeio.ActivityMonitor.onPacket(ActivityMonitor.java:42)
>> >       at
>> > org.activeio.adapter.SyncToAsyncChannel.run(SyncToAsyncChannel.java:150)
>> >       at
>> > edu.emory.mathcs.backport.java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:643)
>> >       at
>> > edu.emory.mathcs.backport.java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:668)
>> >       at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
>> > Caused by: java.net.SocketException: Connection closed by remote host
>> >       at
>> > com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.checkWrite(SSLSocketImpl.java:1168)
>> >       at
>> > com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.AppOutputStream.write(AppOutputStream.java:43)
>> >       at
>> > org.activeio.net.SocketStreamChannel.write(SocketStreamChannel.java:183)
>> >       at
>> > org.activeio.adapter.OutputStreamChannelToOutputStream.write(OutputStreamChannelToOutputStream.java:48)
>> >       at
>> org.activeio.packet.ByteArrayPacket.writeTo(ByteArrayPacket.java:126)
>> >       at
>> org.activeio.net.SocketSyncChannel.write(SocketSyncChannel.java:113)
>> >       at
>> > org.activeio.adapter.SyncToAsyncChannel.write(SyncToAsyncChannel.java:184)
>> >       at
>> org.activeio.FilterAsyncChannel.write(FilterAsyncChannel.java:50)
>> >       at
>> > org.apache.activemq.transport.activeio.ActivityMonitor.write(ActivityMonitor.java:47)
>> >       at
>> org.activeio.FilterAsyncChannel.write(FilterAsyncChannel.java:50)
>> >       at
>> > org.activeio.command.AsyncChannelToAsyncCommandChannel.writeCommand(AsyncChannelToAsyncCommandChannel.java:41)
>> >       at
>> > org.apache.activemq.transport.activeio.ActiveIOTransport.oneway(ActiveIOTransport.java:95)
>> >       at
>> > org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportFilter.oneway(TransportFilter.java:90)
>> >       at
>> > org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportFilter.oneway(TransportFilter.java:90)
>> >       at
>> > org.apache.activemq.transport.WireFormatNegotiator.oneway(WireFormatNegotiator.java:65)
>> >       at
>> > org.apache.activemq.transport.MutexTransport.oneway(MutexTransport.java:44)
>> >       at
>> > org.apache.activemq.transport.ResponseCorrelator.oneway(ResponseCorrelator.java:54)
>> >       at
>> > org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnection.asyncSendPacket(ActiveMQConnection..java:1041)
>> >       ... 16 more
>> >
>> >
>> > I will have to move to SwiftMQ if noone has any insight or suggestions
>> for
>> > this problem, which isn't really something I want to do!
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> >
>> > Steve
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Steve Barham                       tel: +44 (0)7973 199 471
>> > Systems Engineer
>> > Formicary - delivering quality financial technology solutions
>> > http://www.formicary.net/
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > This mail has originated outside your organization,
>> > either from an external partner or the Global Internet.
>> > Keep this in mind if you answer this message.
>> >
>> > This mail has originated outside your organization, either from an
>> > external partner or the Global Internet. Keep this in mind if you
>> answer
>> > this message.
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Steve Barham                       tel: +44 (0)7973 199 471
>> Systems Engineer
>> Formicary - delivering quality financial technology solutions
>> http://www.formicary.net/
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>


-- 
Steve Barham                       tel: +44 (0)7973 199 471
Systems Engineer
Formicary - delivering quality financial technology solutions
http://www.formicary.net/

Reply via email to