On 4/18/06, ssozonoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi James, > > Thanks for your lengthy response. I do agree with you that the "comet" bases > approach offers a much more robust and reliable solution. I had flagged > Jetty 6 and Solaris as part of our solution to scale as well as possible on > a single box. > > We are building a solution using a C# based rich client as the "browser" and > I am very keen on adapting what you have in the Ajax package namespace to > work for us. > Basically rewriting some of the amq.js client side JavaScript in our rich > client as well as other things.
If you are using C# then why not use the C# client for JMS/ActiveMQ? http://activemq.org/OpenWire+dotNet -- James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
