Hi Adrian, If you get a hold of the BrokerServer it should be possible navigate the object tree and be able to get a Queue object and ask it to delete it's messages.
On 5/17/06, Adrian Tarau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
James? Anybody? Help? :) Adrian Tarau wrote: > James? Any suggestions how to clear a queue with activemq API without > JMX? Thanks. > > Adrian Tarau wrote: >> I know the utility of JMX, I use it :) But right now I don't want to >> activate JMX. I saw that ActiveMQ use MX4J 2.1.1(why don't use >> 3.0.1?) and I have already in my application MX4J 3.0.1 libraries and >> I remember I used 3.0.1 with a project that need 2.1.x and was not >> working. >> >> And of course I cannot have two version of MX4J in my application. >> >> James Strachan wrote: >>> On 5/15/06, Adrian Tarau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> Since I use embedded JMS is not necessary to activate also JMX, >>> >>> JMX is extremely useful. e.g. in JConsole you can watch all of the >>> mbeans in an application (the garbage collector, number of threads, >>> amount of memory free together wtih the ActiveMQ mbeans such as all >>> the destinations & consumers and queue depths etc >>> >>> >>>> and JMX >>>> MBeans already use those parts to interrogate for values outside >>>> the JMS >>>> standard. Why not to be accessible with Java code and only JMX? >>> >>> Everything is accessible via Java code and JMX; the reason I suggest >>> JMX is that >>> >>> (i) it can work with remote brokers too >>> (ii) it works great in JConsole - so its really easy to look at the >>> mbeans whenever you like (rather than having to write Java code) >>> >> >
-- Regards, Hiram
