On 6/7/06, red3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you read my original post at the start of the thread you will see that I have already read this documentation and that we have the reliable:// transport in place (AMQ 3), which if you will read the documentation is the same as failover:// and was renamed for ActiveMQ 4. Our problems are with the unreliable behaviour experienced when this architecture is in place.
Note that the client side reliable:// in AMQ3 and failover:// in AMQ4 (BTW it was renamed in 4 to make it explicit what it does - failover to a new connection, thats all) -purely does client side reconnection - it does not implement HA clustering where messages are replicated to multiple brokers in case one fails and you loose the disk; only Master/Slave does that - which is a broker-side configuration. Though store/forward and Master/Slave depends on the client using failover. --- James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
