James Strachan wrote: > On 6/12/06, ENP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Need I do the same if a master goes absent due to network failure and >> clients >> reconnect to slave? > > Yes - any disconnection of the master is considered a failure of the > master. >
As I learned in a similar thread, this is actually "any disconnection of the master FROM THE SLAVE is considered a failure of the master." This is because the slave doesn't accept connections until the master disappears. So, just because the clients can't reach the master does it mean that they will successfully switch to the slave. -- Christopher G. Stach II
