Hi Lalit, it's a very interesting question... Anser can guided by some more information: - what is your context of JMS usage ? J2EE or stand-alone mode (mix of both solutions)
What are the available products ? JORAM from Objectweb : rock solid , permit many deployments options even in embedded contexts, persistance solution is not bad & architecture quite complex... OpenJMS (sourceforge project) : very nice for first steps but too simple for production aware applications JBOSS MQ : not usable in stand alone (rewriting will permit succh use case) ActiveMQ of course may be some others??? ActiveMQ architecture is quite sexy && enables what is the principal advantage of JMS: strong decoupling between applications with C++ clients connectors...It's quite young so don't have a strong experience of this product in production but TCP/IP config is very complete, many connectors & very ambitious persistance mode. So I can't see any bad thing with this prroduct. I will deploy it very soon in production here (customer site).. HTH Jerome -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Which-Open-source-MOM-t1822625.html#a4971588 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.
