I'm occasionally seeing a similar behaviour with ActiveMQ 4.0. Will add
comments to the issue once I have more concrete info
On 6/21/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's very odd. You wouldn't have an old version of the activemq
jar's somewhere in the classpath would you?
The package names have changed to this shouldn't really be an issue, right?
But it could be related to http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-768
You may want vote for or add your comments to that issue.
Regards,
Hiram
On 6/21/06, christyc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We're seeing a similiar problem, and wanted to see if this is the same
issue.
>
> We have two web apps in Tomcat 2.2.9 that use JMS connections. We were
> using ActiveMQ3.0, things were fine, and now we're testing with ActiveMQ
4.0
> (and I tried 4.0.1) and the results are:
>
> the first web app starting a JMS connection works fine. When the second
web
> app tries to start a JMS connection (after successfully getting a
> ConnectionFactory as the first web app did also), it hangs. We shut
down
> Tomcat, leave the broker running, and turn on Tomcat and the first web
app
> hangs when it tries to start a JMS connection and same with the second
web
> app. Here's the error log (at the end I have the successful
connection):
>
> 2006-06-21 15:25:30,864 [Thread-2] 58 JNDIReferenceFactory.java
> DEBUG Getting instance of org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory
> 2006-06-21 15:25:30,943 [Thread-2] 101 JMSUtil.java
> DEBUG successfully obtained connection factory
> 2006-06-21 15:25:31,312 [Thread-2] 62 WireFormatNegotiator.java
> DEBUG Sending: WireFormatInfo { version=1,
> properties={TightEncodingEnabled=true, TcpNoDelayEnabled=true,
> SizePrefixDisabled=false, StackTraceEnabled=true,
> MaxInactivityDuration=30000, CacheEnabled=true},
magic=[A,c,t,i,v,e,M,Q]}
> 2006-06-21 15:25:31,318 [Thread-2] 167 JMSUtil.java
> DEBUG returning connection: ActiveMQConnection
> {id=ID:machinename.com-33231-1150925131041-1
:0,clientId=null,started=false}
> 2006-06-21 15:25:31,312 [ActiveMQ Transport:
> tcp://localhost/xxx.x.x.x:61616] 139 TcpTransport.java
> DEBUG TCP consumer thread starting
>
>
>
> Here is the successful log of this:
> 2006-06-21 15:14:22,754 [Thread-36] 62 WireFormatNegotiator.java
> DEBUG Sending: WireFormatInfo { version=1,
> properties={TightEncodingEnabled=true, TcpNoDelayEnabled=true,
> SizePrefixDisabled=false, StackTraceEnabled=true,
> MaxInactivityDuration=30000, CacheEnabled=true},
magic=[A,c,t,i,v,e,M,Q]}
> 2006-06-21 15:14:22,796 [ActiveMQ Transport:
> tcp://localhost/xxx.x.x.x:61616] 139 TcpTransport.java
> DEBUG TCP consumer thread starting
> 2006-06-21 15:14:22,816 [Thread-36] 167 JMSUtil.java
> DEBUG returning connection: ActiveMQConnection
> {id=ID:machinename.com-32883-1150924462273-1
:0,clientId=null,started=false}
> 2006-06-21 15:14:22,862 [ActiveMQ Transport:
> tcp://localhost/xxx.x.x.x:61616] 85 WireFormatNegotiator.java
> DEBUG Received WireFormat: WireFormatInfo { version=1,
> properties={StackTraceEnabled=true, TightEncodingEnabled=true,
> TcpNoDelayEnabled=true, SizePrefixDisabled=false,
> MaxInactivityDuration=30000, CacheEnabled=true},
magic=[A,c,t,i,v,e,M,Q]}
> 2006-06-21 15:14:22,862 [ActiveMQ Transport:
> tcp://localhost/xxx.x.x.x:61616] 92 WireFormatNegotiator.java
> DEBUG tcp://localhost/xxx.x.x.x:61616 before negotiation:
> OpenWireFormat{version=1, cacheEnabled=false, stackTraceEnabled=false,
> tightEncodingEnabled=false, sizePrefixDisabled=false}
>
> --
> View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/hung-connecting-to-broker-t1717047.html#a4983639
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
