Thanks James. Does that mean the consumers on the client side should be registered with whatever JMX instrumentation layer that is used by the client-side infrastructure?
-----Original Message----- From: James Strachan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 July 2006 08:00 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: JMX Interfaces The current JMX API available is here... http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/maven/activemq-core/apidocs/org/apa che/activemq/broker/jmx/QueueViewMBean.html Due to the prefetch buffer, it could take 1000 messages from the point at which you say 'stop' on the broker to the point at which a consumer stops receiving messages. For a more immediate 'stop' it'd be better to communicate with the clients directly. e.g. maybe we could add a 'pause/resume' method on the ActiveMQMessageConsumer to make it easy to pause/resume delivery of messages. On 7/5/06, Meeraj Kunnumpurath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's right. Or it could even be residual messages that are already > there in the queue and not yet consumed before the queue was stopped. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hiram > Chirino > Sent: 05 July 2006 17:33 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: JMX Interfaces > > So when you say 'stop a queue' you mean you want to stop delivering > messages to consumers of that queue. But publishing to that queue > should still be allowed? > > On 7/5/06, Meeraj Kunnumpurath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Thanks Hiram. > > > > We use an ESB as a transport adaptor between our business components > > and ActiveMQ. We have business requirements where certain components > > need to be paused. Even though, we can do this at the business > > component level at the ESB, the message is still being consumed by > > the > > > session, even though it is not routed to the stopped business > > component. However, the implication is that the message is lost, > > whilst the business components are paused. We need finer granularity > > in terms of pausing individual queues on the server side. > > > > Ta > > Meeraj > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > Hiram Chirino > > Sent: 05 July 2006 14:34 > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: JMX Interfaces > > > > Hi Meeraj > > > > That's not currently supported. Could you explain what behavior you > > would like to see when a queue is stopped? > > > > Regards, > > Hiram > > > > On 7/5/06, Meeraj Kunnumpurath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Is there a management interface to stop and start individual > > > queues on > > > > > an ActiveMQ node? > > > > > > Thanks in advance > > > Meeraj > > > > > > > > > ***************************************************** > > > > > > You can find us at www.voca.com > > > > > > ***************************************************** > > > This communication is confidential and intended for the exclusive > > > use of the addressee only. You should not disclose its contents to > > > any other person. > > > If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender > > > named > > > > above immediately. > > > > > > Registered in England, No 1023742, Registered Office: Voca Limited > > > Drake House, Three Rivers Court, Homestead Road, Rickmansworth, > > > Hertfordshire, WD3 1FX > > > > > > > > > This message has been checked for all email viruses by MessageLabs. > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Hiram > > > > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com > > > > > > This message has been checked for all email viruses by MessageLabs. > > > > > > This message has been checked for all email viruses by MessageLabs. > > > > > > -- > Regards, > Hiram > > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com > > > This message has been checked for all email viruses by MessageLabs. > > > This message has been checked for all email viruses by MessageLabs. > -- James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/ This message has been checked for all email viruses by MessageLabs. This message has been checked for all email viruses by MessageLabs.
