I've updated this page to make it more obvious the difference. I"ve referred to the non-shared-filesystem/jdbc as 'Pure Master Slave' and provided a table comparing the different approaches to make it a little less confusing...
http://www.activemq.com/site/masterslave.html On 8/21/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/21/06, Ning Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for the reply. > > In this link http://www.activemq.com/site/masterslave.html, it mentioned > that "in ActiveMQ 4.1 or later you can use a <masterconnector> ...", but > if slave won't replicate master's state, I guess that config element is > not needed, right? That element is not used for JDBC master/slave. Pure Master/Slave is different to JDBC Master/Slave and Shared File System Master/Slave. <masterConnector> only applies to pure Master/Slave -- James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
-- James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
