FWIW there's no need to pool the ConnectionFactory and you only need a single Connection object (so I guess thats a kind of pooling, just a really simple pool :) but the session/producer/consumer objects should definitely be pooled.
On 9/14/06, javaxmlsoapdev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Absolutely yes. you should use pooling for JMS factory, JMS connection, consumers etc. These are expensive resources. look at Jencks for pooling. petera wrote: > > Hi, > > Is it advisable to use connection pooling with ActiveMQ connections ? > > TIA Peter > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Connection-pooling-tf2272704.html#a6313305 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.
-- James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
