What is the difference (or relationship) between the ActiveMQ XBean syntax and Spring 2.0 syntax? Are they alternatives to each other? Are they complementing? Do I need to use both or choose between them? I realize the good people of ActiveMQ are simply trying to provide us with a variety of options, but I'm afraid you lost me there :-)
We're now migrating to Spring 2.0, so if we can use just that, without any dependency on XBean, then that would be just fine. Furthermore, it's really convenient to have auto-complete in the XML editor, which I'm not sure is possible with the XBean syntax. Or maybe I'm wrong on that as well... :-( Can anyone please shed some light? Thanks. ps - all the sample XMLs that I could find (e.g. in the AcrtiveMQ tests) seem to be snippets, that is, they are not complete valid XMLs as is. I assume this also has to do with how XBean works... -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/XBean-and-Spring-2.0-tf2409007.html#a6714751 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
