in the test, yes it is. would the journal and sqlserver be queing behind each other for io?
On 10/11/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/11/06, Jamie McCrindle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Rob, > > The database we're using is SQL Server 2005. The messaging we're doing > tends to be relatively slow, i.e. about 40 messages per second off a > number of durable queues. Two of the queues are exclusive consumers. I wonder, was the journal on the same disk as is being used by SQL Server? -- James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
