sorry to offend you, but please don't replay with usless info again. next time, i recommend that you read the question and try and understand it first.
Christopher G. Stach II wrote: > > millerkdm wrote: >> thanks, but i don't need udp lecture. check out activeMQ's 4.xx >> implimentation. they put a reliablity layer on top of udp. i would like >> to >> turn it off--or see if they can get it to work. >> >> >> >> Christopher G. Stach II wrote: >>> There is no reliability in UDP. All you get is data integrity with a >>> checksum. >>> >>> -- >>> Christopher G. Stach II > > Then don't say stupid things. :) If you know where it is, and you're so > smart, fix it yourself. :) I hope that there are higher priorities than > UDP, because disk I/O is going to be a much bigger bottleneck than TCP > vs. UDP, not to mention the various MBean issues and queue browsing > issues. > > -- > Christopher G. Stach II > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/UDP-infinite-loops-tf2425239.html#a6763101 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
