Hello, Rob Lugt said the following on 12.10.2006 12:19:
> I think this leaves us with two possible options:- > 1) use Log4Net > 2) create a static Trace class within the ActiveMQ namespace and pass all > trace calls through this. This could then be a central place where trace > events are dispatched to the desired logging system. > > (1) has the advantage that log4net is good and we aren't re-inventing any > wheels, but has the disadvantage that we are creating a build dependency on > Log4Net - which almost certainly isn't going to be currently used by all the > projects targeting AMQ Another advantage here is that Log4Net is sister apache incubation project ;-) > (2) has the advantage that we are creating no dependencies, but we are > re-inventing a Trace interface. It would be nice to have possibility to use log4net from this static Trace class. Something like: #if LOG4NET // use log4net for output #else // use internal tracing routines #endif -- Oleg
