Its not available from SVN yet - but should be next week
cheers,
Rob
On 12 Oct 2006, at 21:08, yaussy wrote:
Thanks, Rob. Is this in the current 4.1 build? I will try it out...
rajdavies wrote:
keeping messages in memory pending dispatch will be optional for the
4.1 GA version of activemq
cheers,
Rob
On 10 Oct 2006, at 13:22, terrytriple wrote:
Afraid I can't help with your question, but I'm looking for an
answer to the
same question !
We are thinking of moving from a JBossMQ solution to ActiveMQ --
but having
the broker block/throw exceptions because it's out of memory due
to it
holding all the messages in memory is a real problem for us.
With our
existing solution we sometimes have hundreds of thousands of
messages
waiting around.
anyway - looking forward to any reponse to this issue !
yaussy wrote:
When sending persistent messages (durable topics) to a consumer,
and then
the consumer goes away, AMQ 4.x broker consumes memory. Is there
any way
to configure how much it will attempt to keep in memory for
persistent
messages?? Seems to me that's the point of having the persistence
mechanism (i.e. derby or kaha or Oracle) - capacity at that level
is not
an issue. I can't have the Broker attempting to keep all messages
ready
in memory for that failed consumer - it may run out of memory very
quickly.
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Controlling-
memory-usage-for-persistent-messages-tf2382626.html#a6735220
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Controlling-
memory-usage-for-persistent-messages-tf2382626.html#a6783729
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
