Hopefully soon, but that's about the best I can give you for now. There is still a bit of work that remains on the openwire side and right now we're focused on cutting an official release with stomp. As far as the support for the amazon client is concerned, I believe that they have been involved with the lists. It might be worth your time to ask others on the list to get a feel for who is using the amazon client.
On 10/29/06, # Lalit Nagpal # <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nathan- Openwire support, We already added this as a enhancement to our product ... just waiting for you guys to extend the openwire protocol support. The architecture & approach looks cool, but when is it coming up ... of course after the activemq-cpp v 1.0 release ... waiting for it now. You spoke about the openwire client contributed by amazon, I am a bit worried about the support that I may get if I go for that one. Lalit Nagpal CSA, Sungard nmittler wrote: > > I've fixed this in trunk. Thanks for the heads up! > > On 10/28/06, Nathan Mittler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> We've been using gcc 4.x, which hasn't shown that warning - I'll take a >> look. But yes - the support for the stomp protocol is mature at this >> point >> in activemq-cpp. Of course, development is always going on - our main >> focus >> now is adding support for other wire protocols, specifically openwire. >> >> Regards, >> Nate >> >> On 10/27/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > That can be easily fixed. Not all compilers give out the same >> warnings. >> > >> > activemq-cpp is very stable and should be nearing a stable release >> > shortly. >> > >> > On 10/26/06, rnelson < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > >> > > Hello. >> > > >> > > I am wondering who has used the ActiveMQ C++ client. I am using it >> > under >> > > 4.0.2. It seems to work fine, but there is one question I have: >> > > >> > > Under Windows, the following warning gets printed out: >> > > >> > > c:\ActiveMQ\activemq\connector\stomp\commands\AckCommand.h(102) : >> > warning >> > > C4390: ';' : empty controlled statement found; >> > > >> > > Looking at the source code, this is the case. >> > > >> > > My general question is how new the C++ client code is, and if is >> still >> > being >> > > written, or whether it is in a state that is generally considered >> > robust? >> > > Any insights on its use would be great. >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > >> > > Rob Nelson >> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > >> > > -- >> > > View this message in context: >> > >> http://www.nabble.com/Questions-ActiveMQ-C%2B%2B-Client-tf2517793.html#a7022558 >> > > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Regards, >> > Hiram >> > >> > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com >> > >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Questions-ActiveMQ-C%2B%2B-Client-tf2517793.html#a7059713 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
