Jamie McCrindle wrote: > Thanks James, > > cheers, > j. > > On 1/15/07, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Generally speeking, we switch to major version numbers when things are >> completely incompatible. So 3.x won't talk to 4.x etc. When we move >> in minor upgrades such as 4.0.x to 4.1.x then clients should still >> work on the 4.1.x broker; though there's always a little bit of risk >> that we missed something as we don't yet have an automatic integration >> test to ensure that every feature on a 4.0.x client works perfectly on >> a 4.1.x broker etc. >> >> >> On 1/15/07, Jamie McCrindle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > hi all, >> > >> > do all components / applications in a system always need to be >> > upgraded when moving to new versions of activemq? specifically, i'd >> > like to move to activemq 4.1.0 but we have some activemq 4.0.2 client >> > applications that i'd prefer to keep that way rather than doing a big >> > bang migrate. >> > >> > regards, >> > jamie. >> > >> >> >> -- >> >> James >> ------- >> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/ >>
I'm curious as to why you may want to stick with an older client when it's likely that a lot of the improvements are actually on the client side. -- Christopher G. Stach II
