It is for cache purposes. I don't want to be writing hundreds of compiled pages
to disk, and I need a solution that does not depend on a database...so that is
why I've chosen to write a daemon.
Jeremy
> Subject: RE: named pipes or files on disk?
> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:22:32 +0100
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
>
> From: Jer A [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 21 April 2010 22:47
> To: Brian Raven; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: named pipes or files on disk?
>
> > will accessing a html file, that is in the memory of a daemon, load as
> fast/faster
> > when accessed by the cgi script, through sockets?, than if the file
> was on disk?
>
> It depends, but probably. Sockets are a common way of communicating with
> daemons. However, you haven't mentioned why you think you need to speed
> up access to this file.
>
> --
> Brian Raven
>
> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>
> This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you
> are not the intended recipient or have received this e-mail in error, please
> advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message and any
> attachments without retaining a copy.
>
> Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this
> e-mail is strictly forbidden.
>
_________________________________________________________________
Live connected. Get Hotmail & Messenger on your phone.
http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9724462_______________________________________________
ActivePerl mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/mysubs
